Indian Journal of Dental Research

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year
: 2012  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 603--607

Macro design effects on stress distribution around implants: A photoelastic stress analysis


Serhat Emre Ozkir, Hakan Terzioglu 
 Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Serhat Emre Ozkir
Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Ankara
Turkey

Objectives: Biomechanics is one of the main factors for achieving long-term success of implant supported prostheses. Long-term failures mostly depend on biomechanical complications. It is important to distinguish the effects of macro design of the implants. Materials and Methods: In this study, the photoelastic response of four different types of implants that were inserted with different angulations were comparatively analyzed. The implant types investigated were screw cylinder (ITI, Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland), stepped cylinder (Frialit2, Friadent GmbH, Manheim, Germany), root form (Camlog Rootline, Alatatec, Wilshelm, Germany), and cylindrical implant, with micro-threads on the implant neck (Astra, AstraTech, Mölndal, Sweden). In the test models, one of the implants was inserted straight, while the other one was aligned mesially with 15° angles. The superstructures were prepared as single crowns. A 150N loading was applied to the restorations throughout the test. Results: A comparison of the implant designs showed that there were no significant differences between the straight implants; however, between the inclined implants, the most favorable stress distribution was seen with the stepped cylinder implants. The least favorable stress concentration was observed around the root formed implants. Microthreads around the implant neck appeared to be effective in a homogenous stress distribution. Observations showed that misaligned implants caused less stress than straight implants, but the stress concentrations were not homogenous. Conclusion: As there were observable differences between the implant types, straight placed cylindrical implants showed better stress distribution characteristics, while inclined tapering implants had better stress distribution characteristics.


How to cite this article:
Ozkir SE, Terzioglu H. Macro design effects on stress distribution around implants: A photoelastic stress analysis.Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:603-607


How to cite this URL:
Ozkir SE, Terzioglu H. Macro design effects on stress distribution around implants: A photoelastic stress analysis. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Sep 25 ];23:603-607
Available from: https://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2012;volume=23;issue=5;spage=603;epage=607;aulast=Ozkir;type=0