Indian Journal of Dental Research

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year
: 2011  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 799--803

Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: A microleakage study


Daniela Ara˙jo Veloso Popoff1, Fabiana Santos Gonšalves1, Clßudia Silami MagalhŃes1, Allyson Nogueira Moreira1, Raquel ConceišŃo Ferreira2, Ivar A Mj÷r3 
1 College of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
2 State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil
3 University of Florida P. O. Box 100415, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA

Correspondence Address:
Daniela Ara˙jo Veloso Popoff
College of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte
Brazil

Background: Total replacement is the most common technique for defective amalgam restorations, and it represents a major part of restorative dental treatment. Repair is an alternative option for amalgam restorations with localized defects. Aims: This study compared microleakage of amalgam restorations repaired by bonded amalgam or composite resin. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted human pre-molars were prepared and restored with class I amalgam. A simulated defect was prepared that included the cavosurface margin on restorations, and the pre-molars were assigned to two treatment groups (n=15): In group 1, premolars were treated by composite resin (34% Tooth Conditioner Gel + Adper Single Bond 2 + Z100) and in group 2, premolars were repaired by bonded amalgam (34% Tooth Conditioner Gel + Prime and Bond 2.1 + Permite C). The teeth were immersed in a 50% silver nitrate solution, thermocycled, sectioned longitudinally and then observed by three examiners using a stereomicroscope. Microleakage was evaluated using a 0-4 scale for dye penetration, and data was analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests. Results: Neither of the two methods eliminated microleakage completely. Composite resin was significantly the most effective for repair/tooth interface sealing (score 0 = 80.0%; P=0.0317). For the repair/restoration interface, composite resin was also statistically more effective as a sealant (score 0=66%; P=0.0005) when compared to the bonded amalgam technique (score 0=13%; P=0.0005). Conclusions: The use of adhesive systems significantly affected the ability to seal the repair/ tooth interface. However, at the level of the repair/restoration interface, the bonded amalgam technique may increase microleakage.


How to cite this article:
Popoff DV, Gonšalves FS, MagalhŃes CS, Moreira AN, Ferreira RC, Mj÷r IA. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: A microleakage study.Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:799-803


How to cite this URL:
Popoff DV, Gonšalves FS, MagalhŃes CS, Moreira AN, Ferreira RC, Mj÷r IA. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: A microleakage study. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2021 Oct 23 ];22:799-803
Available from: https://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2011;volume=22;issue=6;spage=799;epage=803;aulast=Popoff;type=0