Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 514

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Table of Contents   
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 309-314
Effect of different surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of two resin cements to aged simulated composite core materials


1 Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Department of Public Health, Babol University of Medical Science, Babol, Iran
2 Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Science, Rafsanjan, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Mohadese Shakerian
Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Science, Rafsanjan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.162871

Rights and Permissions

Objective: Roughening of the aged composite resin core (CRC) surface seems essential for durable adhesion. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of various surface treatments and different resin cements on microtensile bond strength (µ TBS) between two aged core build-up composites (CBCs) and feldspathic ceramic. Materials and Methods: A total of 16 composite blocks made of two CBCs, Core.it and Build-it were randomly assigned to four surface treatment groups after water storage and thermocycling (2 weeks and 500 cycles). Experimental groups included surface roughening with air abrasion (AA), hydrofluoric acid, pumice, and laser and then were bonded to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing feldspathic ceramic blocks using two resin cements, Panavia F2 (PF), and Duo-link (DL). The µ TBS was tested, and the fracture mode was assessed. The data were analyzed with multiple analysis of variance to estimate the contribution of different surface treatments, resin cements, and two aged CRCs on µ TBS. Statistical significance level was set at α < 0.05. Results: Surface treatment and cement type significantly affected bond strength (P < 0.001) but the type of CRC did not (P = 0.468). Between roughening methods, the highest and the lowest values of µ TBS were sequentially obtained in AA and Er.YAG laser groups. The highest bond strength was in AA group cemented with PF (31.83 MPa). The most common failure mode was cohesive fracture in the cement. Conclusion: Different surface treatments had different effects on µ TBS of aged CRCs to feldspathic ceramics. PF was significantly better than DL.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article

 
 Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2274    
    Printed34    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded92    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal