|
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
|
|
|
Year : 2014 |
Volume
: 25 | Issue : 5 | Page
: 641-647 |
|
Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated on three different marginal designs using conventional and accelerated casting techniques: An in vitro study
Sharad Vaidya1, Hari Parkash2, Akshay Bhargava2, Sharad Gupta2
1 Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India 2 Department of Prosthodontics, I.T.S Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Correspondence Address:
Sharad Vaidya Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, Solan, Himachal Pradesh India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.147114
|
|
Introduction: Abundant resources and techniques have been used for complete coverage crown fabrication. Conventional investing and casting procedures for phosphate-bonded investments require a 2- to 4-h procedure before completion. Accelerated casting techniques have been used, but may not result in castings with matching marginal accuracy.
Aims and Objectives: The study measured the marginal gap and determined the clinical acceptability of single cast copings invested in a phosphate-bonded investment with the use of conventional and accelerated methods.
Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty cast coping samples were fabricated using conventional and accelerated methods, with three finish lines: Chamfer, shoulder and shoulder with bevel. Sixty copings were prepared with each technique. Each coping was examined with a stereomicroscope at four predetermined sites and measurements of marginal gaps were documented for each.
Statistical Analysis: A master chart was prepared for all the data and was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version. Evidence of marginal gap was then evaluated by t-test. Analysis of variance and Post-hoc analysis were used to compare two groups as well as to make comparisons between three subgroups .
Results: Measurements recorded showed no statistically significant difference between conventional and accelerated groups.
Conclusion: Among the three marginal designs studied, shoulder with bevel showed the best marginal fit with conventional as well as accelerated casting techniques. Accelerated casting technique could be a vital alternative to the time-consuming conventional casting technique. The marginal fit between the two casting techniques showed no statistical difference. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|