|
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
|
|
|
Year : 2014 |
Volume
: 25 | Issue : 5 | Page
: 623-629 |
|
Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions
Devinder Preet Singh1, Arun K Garg1, SP Singh2, US Krishna Nayak3, Mohit Gupta1
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India 2 Department of Oral Health Sciences Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India 3 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Correspondence Address:
Arun K Garg Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.147109
|
|
Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the pre-treatment and post-treatment dental arch changes in both upper and lower arches in orthodontic patients treated with extraction of first premolar teeth.
Subjects and Methods: Measurements were made on casts of 50 post treated cases in the age group of 12-30 years for individual tooth measurements, width of the arches (inter-incisal, inter-canine, inter-premolar and inter-molar) arch length (both right and left sides, anterior segment, posterior segment and total arch length for both for the maxillary and mandibular dental casts.
Statistical Analysis Used: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for Normality, Regression Analysis was done as variables were tested and proved to follow normality. Statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were used to compare the changes in the Class I and Class II div 1 groups.
Results: There was a significant increase in the inter-incisor and inter-canine width post-treatment in the Class I and Class II div 1 subjects in the upper arch but no significant change in inter-incisor width in the lower arch in class I subjects. A significant decline in the inter-molar arch width in both the groups were seen. The inter-premolar arch width declined significantly in Class I cases while it increased significantly in Class II div 1 subjects. There was a significant increase in anterior arch length and a significant decrease in posterior arch length in all subjects.
Conclusions: The findings of this original clinical research should significantly help the orthodontists in orthodontic treatment planning in patients requiring extractions of premolars. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|