|
|
Year : 2009 | Volume
: 20
| Issue : 2 | Page : 153-158 |
|
Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis |
|
Natercia R Silva, Carolina G Castro, Paulo CF Santos-Filho, Gisele R Silva, Roberto E Campos, Paulo Vinicins Soares, Carlos Jose Soares
Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Click here for correspondence address and email
Date of Submission | 06-Aug-2007 |
Date of Decision | 25-Oct-2007 |
Date of Acceptance | 04-Dec-2007 |
Date of Web Publication | 23-Jun-2009 |
|
|
 |
|
Abstract | | |
Background: Post design and material has very important effects on dentinal stress distribution since the post placement can create stresses that lead to root fracture. Materials and Methods: In this study we use finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate stress distribution on endodontically treated maxillary central incisors that have been restored with different prefabricated posts. Six models were generated from the image of anatomical plate: Four metallic posts (ParaPost XH, ParaPost XT, ParaPost XP, and Flexi-Flange) and one fiberglass post (ParaPost Fiber Lux). The sixth model was a control-a sound maxillary central incisor. We used CAD software and exported the models to ANSYS 9.0. All the materials and structures were considered elastic, isotropic, homogeneous, and linear except the fiberglass post which was considered orthotropic. The values for the mechanical properties were obtained by a review of the literature and the model was meshed with 8-node tetrahedral elements. A load of 2N was applied to the lingual surface at an angle of 135°. Results: The stress results were recorded by shear stress and von Mises criteria; it was observed that there was no difference for stress distribution among the titanium posts in the radicular portions and into posts. There was higher stress concentration on the coronary portion with the titanium posts than with the glass fiber post. It seems that the metallic posts' external configuration does not influence the stress distribution. Conclusion: Fiber posts show more homogeneous stress distribution than metallic posts. The post material seems to be more relevant for the stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth than the posts' external configuration. Keywords: Post composition, post design, stress distribution
How to cite this article: Silva NR, Castro CG, Santos-Filho PC, Silva GR, Campos RE, Soares PV, Soares CJ. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:153-8 |
How to cite this URL: Silva NR, Castro CG, Santos-Filho PC, Silva GR, Campos RE, Soares PV, Soares CJ. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2009 [cited 2023 Oct 4];20:153-8. Available from: https://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2009/20/2/153/52888 |
Endodontically treated teeth with severe loss of tooth structure require post-and-core restorations for retention purposes. [1] Several post systems have been described in the literature. [2] The cast post-core system is relatively time consuming and involves an intermediate laboratory phase to elaborate the retaining system, which makes the procedure relatively expensive. [3],[4] Prefabricated posts do not require this intermediate phase and allow the whole restoration to be performed in one visit, which makes it an easier and less expensive technique. [4]
The post systems include components of different rigidity. Because the more rigid component is able to resist forces without distortion, stress is expected to be transferred to the less rigid substrate. [5] The difference between the elastic modulus of dentine and the post material may be a source of stress for root structures. [5] The use of post systems that have an elastic modulus similar to that of dentine and core result in the creation of a mechanically homogenous unit with better biomechanical performance. [6] Thus, the material of the post and core affect the stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth. [7],[8] The effect of post design is also very important for dentinal stress distribution [9] since the placement of a post can create stresses that lead to root fracture. [10]
The placement of a direct post and core is often necessary to provide a foundation and replace dentine and also to provide the necessary retention for subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation. [11],[12] The serrations along the fiber post significantly increases the retention of resin composite core material. [12] However, little is known about the influence of retentive areas on the coronary portion of the post on the stress distribution pattern in the dentin-post complex. It has been difficult to create a valid index of stress distribution at the root structures based solely on experimental and clinical observation. [13] On the other hand, finite element analysis (FEA) has recently become a powerful technique in dental biomechanics.
In this study we use FEA to evaluate stress distribution in an endodontically treated maxillary central incisor that was restored with different prefabricated post systems-one fiberglass post and four titanium posts-with different coronal retentions. The null hypothesis was that post design and composition do not affect the stress distribution.
Materials and Methods | |  |
FEA was used to perform the stress analysis of the tooth. Two-dimensional (2D) elastic linear analysis was used for simplification purposes. This analysis used anatomy-based geometric structures for the dentin, pulp, feldspathic all- ceramic crown, composite resin core made with microhybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA), cortical bone, cancellous bone, periodontal ligament, gutta-percha (Dentsply, Petrópolis, Brazil), and each one of the post systems. In this study, six models were simulated: A control (model C; a sound maxillary central incisor) and five post systems (four titanium post systems and one fiberglass post system). The titanium post systems used were as follows: Model XH (ParaPost XH; Coltθne/Whaledent Inc, Cuyahoga Falls, USA); model XT (ParaPost XT; Coltθne/Whaledent Inc, Cuyahoga Falls, USA); model XP (ParaPost XP; Coltθne/Whaledent Inc, Cuyahoga Falls, USA); and model FF (Flexi-Flange; Essential Dental Systems Inc., S. Hackensack, USA). The lone fiberglass post system was model FL ParaPost (Fiber Lux (Coltθne/Whaledent Inc., Cuyahoga Falls, USA). The effect of the design of these systems on the stress distribution in the coronary and radicular portions of an endodontically treated teeth was evaluated.
Six 2D FEA models of a maxillary central incisor were designed for the analysis of stress distribution induced by applied loads. The stress distribution was analysed using ANSYS 9.0 (ANSYS Inc., Houston, USA). These models were generated from a digital image of the anatomical plate and an intact, endodontically treated maxillary central incisor, in CAD software (Mechanical-AutoCAD V6, Autodesk, Spain) in order to obtain the geometry and contour. The data obtained was exported to ANSYS 9.0 using the IGES format [Figure 1a]. Areas corresponding to each structure were plotted [Figure 1b] and then meshed with isoparametric elements of 8-nodes brick with three degrees of freedom per node (plane 183), according to the mechanical properties of each structure and of the materials used [Figure 1c]. The values for the mechnical properties were obtained by means of a literature review and are listed in [Table 1]. [14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19] The meshing process involves division of the system to be studied into a set of small discrete elements defined by nodes. The number of elements generated varied depending on the different geometries that were meshed, so that the final mesh accurately represented the original geometry. The models had a total of 11,081 elements and 33,534 nodes in model XH; 10,252 elements and 31011 nodes in model XT; 8228 elements and 24,933 nodes in model XP; 10,984 elements and 33,221 nodes in model FF; and 9,229 elements and 28,080 nodes in model FL. All the tooth structures and materials used in the models were considered homogeneous, isotropic, and linearly elastic, except the fiberglass which was considered orthotropic [Table 1], with different material properties for fiberglass in parallel and perpendicular directions. It was assumed that there was ideal adherence between the structures, i.e., the ceramic-cement, cement-core, core-post, post-cement, and cement-dentin interfaces.
In all cases, a static load of 2N was applied to the palatal surface of the crown at an angle of 135° [20,21] to the tooth's longitudinal axis [Figure 1]. Model displacement of all nodes on the lateral surface and base of the cortical bone were constrained [Figure 1d]. The qualitative stress distribution analyses were recorded by Von Mises [Figure 1e] and shear stress criteria [Figure 1f].
Results | |  |
Stress distribution analysis using von Mises and shear stress criteria showed critical zones with great stress concentration. These results are represented in [Figure 2] for von Mises analysis and in [Figure 3] for shear stress analysis. The figures utilize a false-color nonlinear scale for stress. From the von Mises stresses it is clear that there is no difference for stress distribution among the titanium posts in the radicular portions and into posts. When the stress distribution on the coronary portion among the posts was evaluated it could be seen that the stress concentration was associated, especially, to post material. The titanium posts presented higher stress concentration on the coronary portion than the fiber posts. Moreover, compared to fiberglass posts, the titanium posts showed lower stress concentration at the middle third of buccal surface of the radicular dentin. With the FL model the stress distribution pattern was more homogeneous than with the titanium posts.
On analysis by shear stress criteria it was observed that the titanium post systems presented similar behavior among themselves, with stress concentration on the buccal surface of the post. The fiberglass post system showed no stress concentration in the post.
Discussion | |  |
The null hypothesis-i.e., that post design and composition do not affect the stress distribution-was rejected. The stress distribution on endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different prefabricated post systems-glass fiber post and metallic titanium posts-were affected only by the post material. The coronal configuration of the all-titanium posts did not result in different stress distribution into core material and into the dentin portion near the core material.
Oral rehabilitation is inherently difficult, and the functional and parafunctional forces within the mouth result in extremely complex structural responses by the oral tissues. Determination of the resulting stresses can be accomplished only with appropriate stress analysis techniques and with sufficient information of the characteristics of the oral tissues and restorative materials. [5] This study may be useful in the clinical setting for selecting the ideal design and material for a post system so as to provide the maximum possible longevity, since a higher von Mises stress value is a strong indication of a greater possibility of failure. [5]
Experiments have shown that fiberglass posts give better biomechanical performance, with greater fracture loads and with a mode of failure allowing for repair, because the root is not affected by the fracture. [6] Barjau-Escribano et al. [6] found that the stress concentration pattern predicted different biomechanical performances for stainless steel and fiberglass posts. The stress distribution pattern reported by them was similar to that which was observed in this study, with fiberglass posts showing more homogeneous stress distribution than titanium posts. [Figure 2] shows that compared to teeth restored with titanium posts there is higher stress concentration on the buccal surface of the middle third of the radicular tooth restored with the fiberglass post. This is due to the capacity of fiberglass posts to transfer stress to the dentin. The homogeneous stress distribution pattern seen with fiberglass posts may be similar to that seen in teeth restored with feldspathic crown and can be explained by the fact that the modulus of elasticity of the fiberglass post, which fills the pulp space, and that of the dentin is similar.
According to Barjau-Escribano et al., [6] and as observed in this study, titanium posts concentrate stress close to the post-cement interface, promoting weakness of the restored tooth. Akkayan and Gulmez [22] observed that the fractures occurring with the use of fiberglass and quartz post systems could be repaired, whereas this was not true of the fractures occurring with zirconium and titanium post systems. The stress concentration of titanium posts was due to the difference in the stiffness between the post and its surrounding material (core, cement, and dentin). [10],[22] Thus, fiberglass posts can be considered a very good choice for post-endodontic restoration because of three main attributes: It gives good biomechanical performance because post, core, cement, and dentin constitute a homogeneous ensemble; it provides excellent aesthetics, which makes it suitable for restoration in the anterior region; and it shows good adhesion to cement agents. [10]
Some authors consider the design of the post to be an important factor influencing the radicular stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth restored with post systems. [4],[10],[15] In this study, a difference in stress distribution between the models of teeth restored with different coronary and radicular configurations of titanium posts was not observed. Additional investigations, including comparison with tissue morphologic condition, strain gauge data, or in vitro tests, are necessary to further validate our findings. Clinical studies also are needed to show the relative longevity and success rates of different post systems.
This study applied the FEA to better simulate a restored endodontically treated tooth and to describe the stresses created during loading. A major advantage of FEA is its ability to solve complex biomechanical problems for which other methods of study are too cumbersome. [15] However, in the FEA, assumptions related to the material properties of simulated structures (such as isotropy, homogeneity, and linear elasticity) are not usually absolute representations of the structure. Therefore, FEA must ideally be used as an initial step and as an aid for planning further laboratory tests and clinical studies; this will reduce the inaccuracies inherent in FEA. Moreover, according to Pegoretti et al., [23] although the limitations related to the assumption that the stress distributions are identical in all vertical sections parallel to the selected two-dimensional model (plane strain assumption), results based on 2D models have been widely used for modeling the clinical reality. Also, these authors considered that 3D models are definitely more accurate in describing the actual states of stress but, at the same time, much more complicated to realize and they do require a much extensive computing time to be resolved. We used 2D elastic analysis for its simplicity. The small differences observed in the numerical results between the 2D and 3D analyses do not disqulify the use of appropriate 2D models for investigating key aspects of the biomechanics of dental restorations in a single tooth unit. [24]
Conclusion | |  |
Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the following conclusions could be drawn:
- The design of the metallic posts does not significantly influence the biomechanical performance of the complex tooth restoration.
- A fiberglass post shows more homogeneous stress distribution when compared to a metallic titanium post.
- The post material seems to be a more relevant factor on the stress distribution of endodontically treated teeth restored with post than the post's external configuration.
References | |  |
1. | Toksavul S, Zor M, Toman M, Gungor MA, Nergiz I, Artunc C. Analysis of dentinal stress distribution of maxillary central incisors subjected to various post-and-core applications. Oper Dent 2006;31:89-96. |
2. | Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:556-62. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
3. | DeSort KD. The prosthodontic use of endodontically treated teeth: Theory and biomechanics of post preparation. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:203-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
4. | Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J 1993;38:39-45. [PUBMED] |
5. | Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002;28:629-33. |
6. | Barjau-Escribano A, Sancho-Bru JL, Forner-Navarro L, Rodriguez- Cervantes PJ, Perez-Gonzalez A, Sanchez-Marin FT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: Fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent 2006;31:47-54. |
7. | Ukon S, Moroi H, Okimoto K, Fujita M, Ishikawa M, Terada Y, et al . Influence of different elastic moduli of dowel and core on stress distribution in root. Dent Mater J 2000;19:50-64. [PUBMED] |
8. | Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: A mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:442-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
9. | Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. Prosthet Dent J 1984;52:28-35. |
10. | Cooney JP, Caputo AA, Trabert KC. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:540-6. [PUBMED] |
11. | Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-36. [PUBMED] |
12. | Love RM, Purton DG. The effect of serrations on carbon fibre posts- retention within the root canal, core retention, and post rigidity. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:484-8. [PUBMED] |
13. | Li LL, Wang ZY, Bai ZC, Mao Y, Gao B, Xin HT, et al . Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006;119:305-11. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
14. | Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:140-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
15. | Ersoz E. Evaluation of stresses caused by dentin pin with finite elements stress analysis method. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:769-73. |
16. | Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
17. | Joshi S, Mukherjee A, Kheur M, Mehta A. Mechanical performance of endodontically treated teeth. Finite Elements Anal Design 2001;37: 587-601. |
18. | Toparli M. Stress analysis in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:470-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
19. | Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 2005;21:709-15. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
20. | Mitsui FH, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA, Ferrarsei PM. In vitro study of fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intraradicular post systems. Quintessence Int 2004;35:612-6. |
21. | Genovese K. Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 2005;38:2375-89. |
22. | Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7. |
23. | Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002;23:2667-82. [PUBMED] |
24. | Romeed SA, Fok SL, Wilson NH. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:209-15. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |

Correspondence Address: Carlos Jose Soares Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Minas Gerais Brazil
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.52888

[Figure 1], [Figure 1a], [Figure 1b], [Figure 1c], [Figure 1d], [Figure 1e], [Figure 1f], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1] |
|
This article has been cited by | 1 |
Post-endodontic restorative treatments and their mechanical behavior: A narrative review |
|
| Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra, Marina Gullo Augusto, Génesis Alfonzo Leon, Hellen Cristina Budel Brandão, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva | | Dentistry Review. 2023; : 100067 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 2 |
Effect of endodontic sealers on push-out bond strength of CAD-CAM or prefabricated fiber glass posts |
|
| Andréa Pereira de Souza PINTO, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes FRANÇA, Roberta Tarkany BASTING, Cecilia Pedroso TURSSI, José Joatan RODRIGUES JÚNIOR, Flávia Lucisano Botelho AMARAL | | Brazilian Oral Research. 2023; 37 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 3 |
Mechanical Behavior of Composite Filled Teeth Under Compression Load |
|
| Kadir DOGAN, Ismail Yasin SÜLÜ | | Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 4 |
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars Reconstructed by Traditional Casting and CAD-CAM Milling Post and Cores |
|
| Davood Nodehi, Azizollah Moraditalab, Shahrzad Shafiee, Salehe Sekandari, Farzaneh Ahrari, Murilo Baena Lopes | | International Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 2022: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 5 |
Fractured alveolar process displacement evaluation—Effect of the rigidity of wire-composite splints |
|
| João Lucas Carvalho Paz, Carlos José Soares, Jessica Ferreira Rodrigues, Guilherme Araújo Almeida, Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares | | Dental Traumatology. 2021; 37(2): 247 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 6 |
Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with four different post systems and two different crowns- A finite element analysis |
|
| Rajvi Nahar, Sunil Kumar Mishra, Ramesh Chowdhary | | Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020; 10(4): 719 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 7 |
A Clinical Case: Restoration of Toothwear |
|
| Janita Patel | | Dental Update. 2020; 47(3): 253 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 8 |
A Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Different Fiber Posts: An In Vitro Study |
|
| Prerak Doshi, Aruna Kanaparthy, Rosaiah Kanaparthy, Disha S Parikh | | The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2019; 20(10): 1195 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 9 |
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Three Different Esthetic Post Systems |
|
| Vibha Hegde, Nikita Arora | | Journal of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2019; 4(1): 10 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 10 |
THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD |
|
| Abdullah Emre KARAALI,Mehmet Sinan DOGAN,Ayse GÜNAY | | Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 11 |
THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD |
|
| Abdullah Emre KARAALI,Mehmet Sinan DOGAN,Ayse GÜNAY | | Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 12 |
THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD |
|
| Abdullah Emre KARAALI,Mehmet Sinan DOGAN,Ayse GÜNAY | | Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; : 326 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 13 |
THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD |
|
| Abdullah Emre KARAALI,Mehmet Sinan DOGAN,Ayse GÜNAY | | Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; : 326 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 14 |
Direct or indirect post crowns to restore compromised teeth: a review of the literature |
|
| T. A. Owen,M. Barber | | British Dental Journal. 2018; 224(6): 413 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 15 |
Direct or indirect post crowns to restore compromised teeth: a review of the literature |
|
| T. A. Owen,M. Barber | | British Dental Journal. 2018; 224(6): 413 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 16 |
The Effect of Intraradicular Multiple Fiber and Cast Posts on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Wide Root Canals |
|
| Satheesh B. Haralur,Maram Awdah Al Ahmari,Safeyah Abdurrahman AlQarni,Mashael Khaled Althobati | | BioMed Research International. 2018; 2018: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 17 |
The Effect of Intraradicular Multiple Fiber and Cast Posts on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Wide Root Canals |
|
| Satheesh B. Haralur,Maram Awdah Al Ahmari,Safeyah Abdurrahman AlQarni,Mashael Khaled Althobati | | BioMed Research International. 2018; 2018: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 18 |
Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis |
|
| Mohammed Abu Helal,Zhigang Wang | | Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 19 |
Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis |
|
| Mohammed Abu Helal,Zhigang Wang | | Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 20 |
Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review |
|
| F. C. Dos Santos,M. D. Banea,H. L. Carlo,S. De Barros | | The Journal of Adhesion. 2017; 93(1-2): 159 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 21 |
Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review |
|
| F. C. Dos Santos,M. D. Banea,H. L. Carlo,S. De Barros | | The Journal of Adhesion. 2017; 93(1-2): 159 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 22 |
Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Endodontically Weakened Teeth Restored with Different Crown Materials: 3D-FEA Analysis |
|
| Izabela C. M. Moris,Carolina Alves Moscardini,Luana Kelle Batista Moura,Yara Teresinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa,Erica Alves Gomes | | Brazilian Dental Journal. 2017; 28(6): 715 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 23 |
Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Endodontically Weakened Teeth Restored with Different Crown Materials: 3D-FEA Analysis |
|
| Izabela C. M. Moris,Carolina Alves Moscardini,Luana Kelle Batista Moura,Yara Teresinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa,Erica Alves Gomes | | Brazilian Dental Journal. 2017; 28(6): 715 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 24 |
Stress Distribution, Tooth Remaining Strain, and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored Without or With One or Two Fiberglass Posts And Direct Composite Resin |
|
| LM Barcelos,AA Bicalho,C Veríssimo,MP Rodrigues,CJ Soares | | Operative Dentistry. 2017; 42(6): 646 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 25 |
Stress Distribution, Tooth Remaining Strain, and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored Without or With One or Two Fiberglass Posts And Direct Composite Resin |
|
| LM Barcelos,AA Bicalho,C Veríssimo,MP Rodrigues,CJ Soares | | Operative Dentistry. 2017; 42(6): 646 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 26 |
Ferrule Effect |
|
| J.A. Skupien,M.S. Luz,T. Pereira-Cenci | | JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2016; 1(1): 31 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 27 |
Ferrule Effect |
|
| J.A. Skupien,M.S. Luz,T. Pereira-Cenci | | JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2016; 1(1): 31 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 28 |
3D FEA of Hollow and Solid Design Zirconia Dental Dowels |
|
| Mehmet Baybora Kayahan,Zeynep Özkurt-Kayahan,Kubilay Yay,Ender Kazazoglu | | Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015; : n/a | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 29 |
Management of a Massive Resorptive Lesion with Multiple Perforations in a Molar: Case Report |
|
| Swati Borkar,Ida de Noronha de Ataide | | Journal of Endodontics. 2015; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 30 |
A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution by Three Different Designs of Prefabricated Metal Posts on Endodontically Treated Permanent Maxillary Central Incisor: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study |
|
| Jyoti Nadgere, Ganesh Pandurang Mengal | | Journal of Contemporary Dentistry. 2015; 5(3): 123 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 31 |
Effect of Resin Cement Porosity on Retention of Glass-Fiber Posts to Root Dentin: An Experimental and Finite Element Analysis |
|
| Natércia Rezende da Silva,Grazielle Crystine Rodrigues Aguiar,Monise de Paula Rodrigues,Aline Aredes Bicalho,Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares,Crisnicaw Veríssimo,Carlos José Soares | | Brazilian Dental Journal. 2015; 26(6): 630 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 32 |
The Role of Resin Cement on Bond Strength of Glass-fiber Posts Luted Into Root Canals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis ofIn VitroStudies |
|
| R Sarkis-Onofre,JA Skupien,MS Cenci,RR Moraes,T Pereira-Cenci | | Operative Dentistry. 2014; 39(1): E31 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 33 |
Stress distributions in maxillary central incisors restored with various types of post materials and designs |
|
| A.A. Madfa,M.R. Abdul Kadir,J. Kashani,S. Saidin,E. Sulaiman,J. Marhazlinda,R. Rahbari,B.J.J. Abdullah,H. Abdullah,N.H. Abu Kasim | | Medical Engineering & Physics. 2014; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 34 |
The effects of post-core and crown material and luting agents on stress distribution in tooth restorations |
|
| P. Oyar | | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 35 |
Effects of post core materials on stress distribution in the restoration of mandibular second premolars: A finite element analysis |
|
| Gökhan Durmus,Perihan Oyar | | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 36 |
A 3-dimensional finite element analysis of the restoration of the maxillary canine with a complex zirconia post system |
|
| Dong Chen,Na Wang,Ya Gao,Longquan Shao,Bin Deng | | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 37 |
Restauration d’un faux moignon sous une couronne céramique existante |
|
| Hicham Soualhi,Ahd Zaghba,Amal El Yamani | | Actualités Odonto-Stomatologiques. 2014; (269): 4 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 38 |
Restauration d’un faux moignon sous une couronne céramique existante |
|
| Hicham Soualhi,Ahd Zaghba,Amal El Yamani | | Actualités Odonto-Stomatologiques. 2014; (269): 4 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 39 |
Non-carious cervical lesions: influence of morphology and load type on biomechanical behaviour of maxillary incisors |
|
| PV Soares,PCF Santos-Filho,CJ Soares,VLG Faria,MF Naves,JA Michael,JA Kaidonis,S Ranjitkar,GC Townsend | | Australian Dental Journal. 2013; 58(3): 306 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 40 |
Current concepts on the use and adhesive bonding of glass-fiber posts in dentistry: a review |
|
| Aline de Moraes,Maximiliano Cenci,Rafael de Moraes,Tatiana Pereira-Cenci | | Applied Adhesion Science. 2013; 1(1): 4 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 41 |
The influence of ferrule effect and length of cast and FRC posts on the stresses in anterior teeth |
|
| Beata Dejak,Andrzej Mlotkowski | | Dental Materials. 2013; 29(9): e227 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 42 |
3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation |
|
| Beata Dejak,Andrzej Mlotkowski | | Dental Materials. 2013; 29(12): e309 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 43 |
The effects of non carious cervical lesions - Morphology, load type and restoration - On the biomechanical behavior of maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis [OS efeitos das lesões cervicais não cariosas - Morfologia, tipo de carregamento restauração - No comportamento biomecânico de pré-molares superiores: Análise por elementos finitos] |
|
| Soares, P.V. and Milito, G.A. and Pereira, F.A. and Zeola, L.F. and Naves, M.F.L. and Faria, V.L.G. and Machado, A.C. and Souza, P.G. and Reis, B.R. | | Bioscience Journal. 2013; 29(2): 526-535 | | [Pubmed] | | 44 |
In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber andcast metal posts with different designs |
|
| Pasqualin, F.H. and Giovani, A.R. and De Sousa Neto, M.D. and Paulino, S.M. and Vansan, L.P. | | Revista Odonto Ciencia. 2012; 27(1): 52-57 | | [Pubmed] | | 45 |
Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different strategies after mechanical cycling |
|
| Rosa, R., Hwas, A., Melo, D., Valandro, L.F., Kaizer, O. | | General Dentistry. 2012; 60(2): 62-68 | | [Pubmed] | | 46 |
Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots |
|
| da Silva, G.R., Santos-Filho, P.C.F., Simamoto-Júnior, P.C., Martins, L.R.M., da Mota, A.S., Soares, C.J. | | Brazilian Dental Journal. 2011; 22(3): 230-237 | | [Pubmed] | | 47 |
Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth |
|
| Dejak, B., Młotkowski, A. | | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2011; 105(2): 115-126 | | [Pubmed] | | 48 |
Influence of cement thickness and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength between posts and root dentin |
|
| Da Rosa, R.A., Bergoli, C.D., Kaizer, O.B., Valandro, L.F. | | General Dentistry. 2011; 59(4): 156-161 | | [Pubmed] | | 49 |
Diametral tensile strength of composite core material with cured and uncured fiber posts |
|
| Passes, S.P., Jacinta, M., El-Mowafy, O., Rizkalla, A.S., Santos Jr., G.C. | | General Dentistry. 2011; 59(2): 125-128 | | [Pubmed] | | 50 |
Evaluation of stresses in hard dental tissues in tooth wear using finite element analysis: A methodological study |
|
| Linetskiy, I. and Demenko, V. and Nesvit, K. and Shevchenko, A. and Tretjak, I. | | Strength, Fracture and Complexity. 2011; 7(3): 253-272 | | [Pubmed] | | 51 |
Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth |
|
| Beata Dejak,Andrzej Mlotkowski | | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2011; 105(2): 115 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 52 |
Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots |
|
| Gisele Rodrigues da Silva,Paulo César de Freitas Santos-Filho,Paulo Cézar Simamoto-Júnior,Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins,Adérito Soares da Mota,Carlos José Soares | | Brazilian Dental Journal. 2011; 22(3): 230 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 53 |
Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots |
|
| Gisele Rodrigues da Silva,Paulo César de Freitas Santos-Filho,Paulo Cézar Simamoto-Júnior,Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins,Adérito Soares da Mota,Carlos José Soares | | Brazilian Dental Journal. 2011; 22(3): 230 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 54 |
Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Post-retained Restorations: An Overview |
|
| Mahmoud Khaled AL-Omiri,Ahmad Abdelaziz Mahmoud,Mohammad Ramadan Rayyan,Osama Abu-Hammad | | Journal of Endodontics. 2010; 36(9): 1439 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 55 |
Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: An overview |
|
| Khaled Al-Omiri, M. and Mahmoud, A.A. and Rayyan, M.R. and Abu-Hammad, O. | | Journal of Endodontics. 2010; 36(9): 1439-1449 | | [Pubmed] | | 56 |
Infinite to finite: An overview of finite element analysis |
|
| Srirekha, A. and Bashetty, K. | | Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2010; 21(3): 425-432 | | [Pubmed] | |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 19832 | | Printed | 861 | | Emailed | 22 | | PDF Downloaded | 1887 | | Comments | [Add] | | Cited by others | 56 | |
|

|