Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 1069

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 144-148
Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor associated with ameloblastoma – A rare histological variant


Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, Telangana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication20-Mar-2019
 

   Abstract 

Calcifying odontogenic cysts (COCs) represent a heterogeneous group of lesions that exhibits a variety of clinical, behavioral, and histological features. COC or Gorlin's cyst is now classified by the World Health Organization as a tumor. Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT) is an uncommon developmental odontogenic lesion that demonstrates histopathologic diversity. Odontogenic tumors such as ameloblastoma have been reported to be associated with CCOT. In this paper, we report a case of ameloblastomatous CCOT in a 16-year-old girl with involvement of mandibular posterior region, which is an extremely rare histologic variant.

Keywords: Ameloblastoma, calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor, Gorlin's cyst

How to cite this article:
Muddana K, Maloth AK, Dorankula SP, Kulkarni PG. Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor associated with ameloblastoma – A rare histological variant. Indian J Dent Res 2019;30:144-8

How to cite this URL:
Muddana K, Maloth AK, Dorankula SP, Kulkarni PG. Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor associated with ameloblastoma – A rare histological variant. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 17];30:144-8. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2019/30/1/144/254501

   Introduction Top


Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC) is a unique and uncommon developmental odontogenic lesion first described by Gorlin et al. in 1962.[1] It considered as a rare lesion and accounts for 1% of jaw cysts. To the best of our knowledge, till now, only 30 cases of CCOT associated with ameloblastoma have been reported. In 2005, the WHO reclassified COC as calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT).[2] It usually occurs as a slow-growing painless tumor, there is no predilection to either maxilla or mandible. However, some studies[3],[4] have mentioned the mandible as the more commonly involved site. Mashhadi Abbas et al. in 2009 have reported a peak frequency in the second decade.[4] Radiographically, CCOT may present as unilocular or multilocular radiolucencies with discrete, well-demarcated margin.[5] The CCOT presents a wide range of histologic features, but most commonly a well-defined cystic lesion is found with a fibrous connective tissue wall lined by odontogenic epithelium. The most characteristic histopathologic feature is the presence of variable numbers of ghost cells within the epithelium component. They may also show ameloblastomatous proliferative activity intraluminally or intramurally. The neoplastic variant of CCOT shows a solid growth pattern consisting of ameloblastoma-like strands and islands of odontogenic epithelium infiltrating into mature fibrous connective tissue.[6]


   Case Report Top


A 16-year-old female patient presented to the department of oral medicine and radiology with the chief complaint of swelling in the right mandibular buccal vestibular region for 3 months. The swelling started as a small size and gradually increased to attain the present size. No history of pain and other associated signs and symptoms was present. Her medical history and dental history were noncontributory. Extraoral examination revealed a solitary swelling present on the lower right body of mandible, measuring 3 cm × 2 cm in diameter, which was nontender and bony hard in consistency. Intraorally, swelling was present in the right buccal sulcus causing vestibular obliteration, measuring 3 cm × 2 cm, extending from distal aspect of 43 to distal aspect of 46 with grade 1 mobility of 46. Mucosa over the swelling appeared to be normal.

Panoramic radiography revealed a well-defined radiolucency involving the right body of the mandible from tooth 43 to 46. The lesion measured about 3 cm × 6 cm and was oval. Resorption of root of 46 was also evident [Figure 1]. Axial section in computed tomography revealed the presence of a large unilocular radiolucency with the expansion of well-corticated right mandibular buccal and lingual cortical plates [Figure 2]. On the basis of history and clinical examination and radiological features, provisional diagnosis was given as infected odontogenic cyst.
Figure 1: Radiolucency involving from 43 to 46

Click here to view
Figure 2: Computed tomography scan shows hypodense area, buccal cortical plate expansion on the right side of mandible

Click here to view


To obtain a definite diagnosis, an incisional biopsy was taken from the buccal cortex between teeth #44 and #46 and sent for histopathological evaluation.

Histologic examination of the biopsy tissue revealed a cystic lesion lined by odontogenic epithelium. The lesion showed cystic lining containing basal tall columnar cells with reverse polarity of the nucleus. There is also the presence of suprabasal stellate reticulum-like cells with numerous ghost cells within the lining epithelium [Figure 3]. Connective tissue capsule consists of collagen fiber bundles and dense inflammatory cells. Based on the histological features, a diagnosis of infected CCOT was given.
Figure 3: Cystic cavity lined by odontogenic epithelium with ghost cells

Click here to view


The patient was treated surgically. Under general anesthesia, the right hemimandibulectomy was done in relation to 44–46 regions. Reconstruction was done by demineralized dried bone allograft with platelet-rich fibrinogen. Entire excisional specimen was sent for histopathological reevaluation.

Excisional biopsy tissue shows similar features of CCOT. In few areas, the cystic epithelium exhibited proliferation in the form of thin strands and cords [Figure 4]. Cords lined by tall columnar ameloblast-like cells and connected with stellate reticulum-like cells. Few ghost cells were present within the epithelium [Figure 5] Connective tissue shows the presence of dense collagen bundles, hemorrhagic areas, and inflammatory cell infiltrate. Based on the above findings, CCOT associated with ameloblastoma was given (according to Praetorius 2006). No immunohistochemical analysis was performed for the present case as histopathological evaluation is confirmatory for the diagnosis.
Figure 4: Odontogenic strands and cords

Click here to view
Figure 5: Presence of ghost cells within the odontogenic epithelium

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The CCOT is an uncommon lesion that demonstrates considerable histologic diversity and presents variable clinical behavior. It shows both cystic and neoplastic variants. In view of this duality, many different terminologies have been applied to cystic and neoplastic variants.[7] Several classifications of CCOT subtypes have been proposed, but most of them have limitations in separating cystic and neoplastic variant.

Different classifications are shown in [Table 1].[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]
Table 1: Different classification systems

Click here to view


Ameloblastomatous CCOT is a rare variant because of the rarity of ameloblastomatous CCOT, and determination of the most common age, sex, and location of this lesion is difficult. According to Kallalli in 2017 and Mashhadi Abbas et al. in 2008, it seems that most of the patients are between 10-30 years old, and the tumor tends to involve the posterior region of the mandible.[4],[11] In the present case, the lesions involve mandibular posterior region in a 16-year-old patient.

Radiographically, the lesion appears as a well-defined, unilocular, or multilocular, often quite large radiolucency that may or may not contain varying amounts of radiopaque material associated with unerupted tooth. Root resorption or root divergence may also be observed.[13] The present case showed unilocular radiolucency extending in the right side body of the mandible, extending from distal aspect of #43 to #46.

Ameloblastomatous CCOT microscopically resembles unicystic ameloblastoma, except for the ghost cells and calcification within the proliferative epithelium. The present case had similar microscopic findings. Histopathologically, our case has been diagnosed as CCOT associated with ameloblastoma due to the ghost cells in the ameloblastomatous epithelial islands, and it fits into the category of cystic calcifying ghost cell odontogenic tumor, as suggested by Toida. Or CCOT associated with ameloblastoma according to Praetorius 2006. Bharti et al., in 2010, suggested that if the COC was associated with an ameloblastoma, its behavior and prognosis would be like neoplasm rather than cyst.[14]

There are few odontogenic lesions which are consider to be hisopathological mimicker of the CCOT associated with ameloblastoma, such as CCOT with odontoma, CCOT associated with ameloblastic fibroma.

However, CCOT associated with odontoma[15] shows the presence of dentin-like hard tissue and pulp spaces histologically, which is not evident in the present case. CCOT associated with ameloblastic fibroma[16] exhibits dental papilla-like mesenchyme along with numerous small odontogenic follicles, which is not seen in the present case.


   Conclusion Top


CCOT associated with ameloblastoma is a rare histologic variant. There are very few cases reported with this variety of CCOT in the literature. Several authors have suggested that if CCOT is associated with an ameloblastoma, its behavior and prognosis will be that of an ameloblastoma, not of CCOT. Many cases with ameloblastomatous CCOT should be reported to understand its biological behavior. Careful postoperative observations are necessary for these types of cases.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ, Clausen FP, Vickers RA. The calcifying odontogenic cyst - A possible analogue of the cutaneous calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe. An analysis of fifteen cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1962;15:1235-43.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Aithal D, Reddy BS, Mahajan S, Boaz K, Kamboj M. Ameloblastomatous calcifying odontogenic cyst: A rare histologic variant. J Oral Pathol Med 2003;32:376-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Li TJ, Yu SF. Clinicopathologic spectrum of the so-called calcifying odontogenic cysts: A study of 21 intraosseous cases with reconsideration of the terminology and classification. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:372-84.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mashhadi Abbas FA, Moshref MA, Sargolzaie SA, Kargahi N. Ameloblastomatous calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor: A rare histologic variant. Shiraz Univ Dent J 2009;9:45-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Iida S, Fukuda Y, Ueda T, Aikawa T, Arizpe JE, Okura M. Calcifying odontogenic cyst: Radiologic findings in 11 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:356-62.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ledesma-Montes C, Gorlin RJ, Shear M, Prae Torius F, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Altini M, et al. International collaborative study on ghost cell odontogenic tumours: Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour, dentinogenic ghost cell tumour and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37:302-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Singh HP, Yadav M, Nayar A, Verma C, Aggarwal P, Bains SK. Ameloblastomatous calcifying ghost cell odontogenic cyst – A rare variant of a rare entity. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2013;4:156-60.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Praetorius F, Hjørting-Hansen E, Gorlin RJ, Vickers RA. Calcifying odontogenic cyst. Range, variations and neoplastic potential. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:227-40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart PA, Sidransky D. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of the Head and Neck. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Toida M. So-called calcifying odontogenic cyst: Review and discussion on the terminology and classification. J Oral Pathol Med 1998;27:49-52.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Hong SP, Ellis GL, Hartman KS. Calcifying odontogenic cyst. A review of ninety-two cases with re-evaluation of their nature as cysts or neoplasms, the nature of ghost cells and subclassification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:56-64.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Shear M, Speight P. Cysts of the Oral and Maxillofacial Regions 4th edition Blackwell- Munksgaard 2007. p. 101. (Praetorius F 2006, personal communication).  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Iida S, Ueda T, Aikawa T, Kishino M, Okura M, Kogo M. Ameloblastomatous calcifying odontogenic cyst in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:409-12.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bharti CS. Calcifying odontogenic cyst – A case report and review of literature. JIDAT 2010;2:140-2.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Radheshyam C, Alokenath B, Kumar H, Abikshyeet P. Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor associated with an odontome – A diverse lesion encountered. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2015;7:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yoon JH, Kim HJ, Yook JI, Cha IH, Ellis GL, Kim J. Hybrid odontogenic tumor of calcifying odontogenic cyst and ameloblastic fibroma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:80-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Keerthi Muddana
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda - 508 254, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_105_17

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed342    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded47    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal