Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 1913

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 117-122
Oral and masticatory rehabilitation using osseointegrated dental implants after resective treatment of multicystic ameloblastoma in the lower jaw with a fibula graft


1 Department of Implantology, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Positivo University, Rua Professor Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza, 5300 Campo Comprido, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
2 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Positivo University, Rua Professor Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza, 5300 Campo Comprido, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
3 Department of Pathology, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Positivo University, Rua Professor Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza, 5300 Campo Comprido, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication12-Feb-2018
 

   Abstract 

Ameloblastoma is an aggressive odontogenic tumor which typically occurs between third and fourth decade of life that often needs resective approach. Immediate reconstruction may show better results. The treatment of multicystic ameloblastoma in the mandible being a rare case that occurred in the late second decade of life, which was surgically removed along with the affected teeth with safety margins, and the region was immediately reconstructed using a vascularized graft, removed from the fibula. Its integration, in combination with osseointegrated dental implants and fixed implant-supported prostheses, restored chewing function and esthetics. After 6 years from fibular graft and 24 months of dental implants, an excellent outcome was observed, with oral health and normal functions properly restored, and the immediate reconstruction of the mandible in resective cases, associated with oral rehabilitation with dental implants, may be considered a suitable treatment option.

Keywords: Ameloblastoma, bone graft, dental implants, fibula graft, prosthetic rehabilitation

How to cite this article:
Grossi JR, Deliberador TM, Saad T, Scariot R, Zielak JC, Giovanini AF. Oral and masticatory rehabilitation using osseointegrated dental implants after resective treatment of multicystic ameloblastoma in the lower jaw with a fibula graft. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:117-22

How to cite this URL:
Grossi JR, Deliberador TM, Saad T, Scariot R, Zielak JC, Giovanini AF. Oral and masticatory rehabilitation using osseointegrated dental implants after resective treatment of multicystic ameloblastoma in the lower jaw with a fibula graft. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 14];29:117-22. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2018/29/1/117/225246

   Introduction Top


Ameloblastoma represents 10% of odontogenic epithelial tumors [1],[2],[3],[4] and is the second most prevalent after odontomas,[5] accounting for 1% of all tumors and jaw cysts that predominantly affect the mandible.[2],[4],[6],[7] The region most affected is the body of the mandible and its ascending branch.[2] The evolution of this tumor is characterized by asymptomatic slow expansion with persistent and aggressive behavior being capable of infiltrating adjacent tissues, causing cortical bone expansion, severe facial deformities, functional impairment, paresthesia, and trismus [2],[6],[8] and may induce root resorption and high rates of relapse when inadequately treated.[1],[8]

Ameloblastomas are classified into different types: solid or multicystic, unicystic, desmoplastic, peripheral or soft tissue,[2],[4],[5],[9] and malignant, which are the most aggressive types.[2],[7]

Diagnosis is achieved through radiographic examination at the time of routine consultations or when the tumor leads to facial asymmetry. Radiographically, it shows significant variation with multilocular and unilocular characteristics commonly seen, which may or may not be well defined,[2] appearing as “honeycomb” or “soap bubbles.”[6]

The recommended treatment relies on a surgical approach, the extent of which depends on the size of the lesion and the different characteristics of the tumor. Radical surgical treatment involves resection of the ameloblastoma with safety margins of at least 1–3 cm of normal bone [1],[2],[5],[9],[10] or with healthy bone surrounding the area where the teeth in direct contact with the tumor are removed. Conservative surgery involves total tumor enucleation and subsequent curettage; however, this method leads to an increased rate of relapse, usually occurring a few years following conservative treatment.[1],[2],[4],[5],[9]

These tumors usually develop between the third and the fourth decades of life.[1],[2],[4],[8] In young patients, unicystic ameloblastomas are rare and their resections may generate future difficulties as it interrupts the growth and development of the anatomical structures affected by these tumors.[3] Moreover, these tumors can lead to functional and esthetic problems, including chewing difficulties, which may benefit from more conservative treatment.[5]

The aim of this paper was to report a clinical case of oral rehabilitation with dental implants and fixed prostheses, after the resective treatment of a multicystic ameloblastoma associated with immediate microvascularized fibular grafting.


   Outline of the Case Top


A 28-year-old patient sought treatment for hemimandible rehabilitation with dental implants after the resective treatment of an ameloblastoma at the Positivo University. The patient was diagnosed with endodontic periapical cyst with chronic inflammation in lower right premolars at 18 years of age [Figure 1]. This was diagnosed through a panoramic radiography at the end of orthodontic treatment revealing the presence of a radiolucent circumscribed lesion located in the right side of the body of the mandible. No cortical bone expansion or dental displacement was observed, and biopsy of the region with intraoral bone curettage was performed.
Figure 1: Initial panoramic radiograph

Click here to view


After clinical and radiographic monitoring for 3 years, the patient presented with tumor relapse, which required surgical removal showing pain and swelling that affected the body of the mandible and its ascending ramus. An irregular fragment of bone tissue was resected for a new histopathological examination [Figure 2]. Along with this histopathological examination, new imaging tests including bone densitometry and panoramic radiography were performed, which confirmed the diagnosis of multicystic ameloblastoma.
Figure 2: Computerized tomography three-dimensional before fragment of bone tissue was resected

Click here to view


After the confirmation of this new diagnosis, the patient underwent a resective hemimandibulectomy, in which five teeth adjacent to the tumor were removed and an autogenous microvascularized fibula graft was simultaneously performed, fixed at the remaining stumps of the jaw using plates and screws [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Panoramic radiograph with plates and screws used before resective surgery

Click here to view


Final rehabilitation was scheduled after 12 months for the incorporation and maturation of the graft. However, the patient decided not to install the dental implants within the stipulated period. The postsurgical evolution, incorporation, and maturation of the fibular graft occurred without complications and the region appeared completely healthy, with no signs of tumor recurrence or inflammation [Figure 4]. This indicated that the procedure is feasible for the reconstruction of this region with dental implants.
Figure 4: Computerized tomography three-dimensional after implant surgery and before removed the plates and screws

Click here to view


Five years after tumor removal and the incorporation of the fibular graft, the patient began to notice the effect of partial edentulism in the right mandibular region, and the upper teeth appeared uneven. The installation of three dental implants was then planned since the patient did not present any systemic problems.

For the surgical procedure, extra and intraoral antisepsis was achieved using 0.12% chlorhexidine and local anesthetic infiltration administered with 4% articaine hydrochloride. An intrasulcular incision was made using a 15C blade in the region and extended over the bone crest. Total detachment of the flap was performed using a Molt periosteal elevator [Figure 5].
Figure 5: Fibular graft area exposed before implant placement

Click here to view


Three implants were installed following the manufacturer protocol was placed in the region and suturing was performed with nylon thread 5–0 [Figure 6].
Figure 6: Implants with cover screws placed on fibular graft

Click here to view


For managing postoperative pain, 500 mg amoxicillin every 8 h for 7 days, 400 mg etodolac every 8 h for 3 days, and 750 mg paracetamol every 8 h for 2 days were prescribed. A mouthwash with a solution of chlorhexidine digluconate without alcohol every 12 h for 14 days, and the sutures were removed after 10 days. The recovery of the patient was monitored monthly.

A minimum period of 90 days to allow time for osseointegration and for the reopening of the implants and subsequent oral rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses, and after this period, the dental implants were reopened through an incision on the bone crest for the installation of bone healing abutments, measuring 4 mm in height. A 4% articaine hydrochloride local anesthesia was infiltrated and suturing was performed with wire 4–0.

Seven days after removal of the sutures, dental moldings were obtained for fabrication of the implant-supported prostheses, owing to the difference in height between the mandibular and the grafted edge. The prosthetic planning for the rehabilitation of this region was established by creating a fixed prosthesis in porcelain with four elements, supported by three implants as showed on panoramic radiograph [Figure 7] and compensated with pink porcelain [Figure 8] and [Figure 9], which reestablished the masticatory function and esthetics of the region [Figure 10] and [Figure 11].
Figure 7: Final panoramic radiograph after implant placement and prosthesis screwed in place

Click here to view
Figure 8: Close-up in occlusal view of final porcelain prosthesis in place

Click here to view
Figure 9: Close-up in lateral view of final porcelain prosthesis in place

Click here to view
Figure 10: Full arch in occlusal view of final porcelain prosthesis in place

Click here to view
Figure 11: Close-up in frontal view with lip retractors of final porcelain prosthesis in place

Click here to view


After the installation of the prosthesis, the patient complained of severe pain in the region due to chewing and biomechanical loads related to the return of the correct occlusion. Therefore this, the use of muscle relaxants was prescribed and the remission of symptoms was observed within 5 days. The patient was monitored for 36 months after prosthetic rehabilitation, with assessment of the function and esthetics of the region. The patient was very pleased with the outcome of this treatment as the patient noticed a significant improvement in function, esthetics, and phonetic quality [Figure 12].
Figure 12: Full smile view of final porcelain prosthesis in place

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


According to these authors,[8],[10] multicystic or solid ameloblastoma more commonly develops in patients aged 44 years and was confirmed that it is rare in younger patients.[4] In this case report, the first manifestations of the disease were observed at 18 years of age.

Clinically, multicystic ameloblastoma is the most aggressive variant, owing to its ability to infiltrate into bone trabeculae. In this case, tumor aggressiveness was observed during the radiographic follow-up when, in a relatively short period of time, the injury spreads throughout the whole body and into the ascending ramus of the right jaw.

The treatment should be very well evaluated and planned as the choice of treatment depends on the clinical characteristics of the patient, tumor location, size, and margins as well as the age of the patient and the degree of morbidity that the treatment may cause.[2] The major problem faced with treatment of all types of ameloblastoma is their high recurrence rate, which was previously reported.[1],[9] Moreover, when not removed correctly, ameloblastic islands remain within the trabecular bone or soft tissue and may continue to proliferate, thus leading to the recurrence of this type of tumor, a statement reinforced by another author.[5]

In the case analyzed in this study, three biopsies were performed before arriving at the correct diagnosis. The early diagnosis of endodontic periapical cyst resulted in two relapses and favored the proliferation of the tumor. When the correct diagnosis was reached 5 years after the beginning of the treatment, the size of the tumor had significantly increased, thus necessitating a surgical approach. Mandibular hemisection and the immediate reconstruction were performed using a fibular graft. This is the most radical treatment, requiring surgical excisions with safety margin from 1 to 2 cm of healthy bone,[6] as recommended by many authors before.[1],[5],[9],[10] This technique resulted in a slight facial asymmetry and loss of sensitivity of the adjacent structures, owing to the interruption of the main nerves of this region.

Moreover, the different rates of relapse depend on the surgical technique that was used the number of cases and the monitoring period.[2],[8] The clinical and radiographic follow-up of these lesions is therefore very important, in particular, owing to a recurrence rate of 50% of the cases within the first 7 years of tumor removal.[4]

Tumor recurrence depends on several factors, such as the choice of treatment for the primary tumor, the extent of the injury, the proliferation of residual portions of the tumor that was not removed with the surgery, and the implantation of tumor tissue in other organs during surgery.[10]

The treatment began in a conservative manner in this patient, using the curettage technique. Tumor recurrence occurred during the 3rd year of follow-up. After this relapse, the tumor recurred within 2 years.

Mandibular reconstructions are performed with reconstruction plates, bone, and skin grafts used to replace the absence of mucosa, and dental implants are installed to rehabilitate part of the dentition that was lost and to finalize the prosthetic reconstruction, according to previous cases reported.[1],[2],[6],[7]

The grafts placed immediately after tumor removal show better results [1],[5] as delayed or late reconstruction of this region may cause lingual collapse and the displacement of the remaining vertical and horizontal mandibular branches. In addition, the dissection and placement of remaining bone stumps is difficult and delicate.

Immediately following tumor resection, the reconstruction of the region promotes an anatomical and functional restoration of the defect. This allows the repair of the affected area in a single surgical procedure, without distortions, deviations, atrophies, and the formation of scars inherent to secondary surgeries. This renders the technique described more reliable, thus being considered as the best alternative treatment for ameloblastomas,[2],[3],[5],[6] as it promotes the complete removal of the tumor with esthetic and functional rehabilitation during the same surgical procedure. Moreover, rehabilitation with dental implants can be performed after a relatively short time, thus providing the patient the return of normal chewing functions.

Segmental defects of the mandible can be reconstructed using vascularized or nonvascularized grafts, with vascular grafts being the first choice for mandibular reconstructions.[2] Nevertheless, this method is not optimal since it increases the operating time, morbidity of the donor site, and cost.


   Conclusions Top


In this case, a microvascularized fibular graft was used immediately after tumor resection. It was considered the best surgical option, owing to the extent of the lesion and the favorable conditions of the patient to undergo this procedure. The installation of dental implants and rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses occurred 5 years after the resective treatment, as chosen by the patient.

Multicystic ameloblastoma is an extremely aggressive tumor, requiring the removal of a large area of adjacent tissue for its complete removal and the extraction of the teeth involved. Nevertheless, this study concludes that excellent long-term results are observed when a correct diagnosis and treatment plan is formulated. The fibula is a good option for an immediate reconstructive surgical approach with vascularized autogenous grafts.

After its complete incorporation, this graft becomes viable to receive dental implants that support functions and chewing loads. Esthetics and oral health are restored with minor or no consequences, reduced morbidity and minimal treatment time, owing to a reduced number of surgical interventions. This subsequently increases long-term functional and esthetic prognosis.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Curi MM, Dib LL, Pinto DS. Management of solid ameloblastoma of the jaws with liquid nitrogen spray cryosurgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:339-44.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Zemann W, Feichtinger M, Kowatsch E, Kärcher H. Extensive ameloblastoma of the jaws: Surgical management and immediate reconstruction using microvascular flaps. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:190-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Andrade NN, Shetye SP, Mhatre TS. Trends in pediatric ameloblastoma and its management: A 15 year Indian experience. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2013;12:60-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Eckardt AM, Kokemüller H, Flemming P, Schultze A. Recurrent ameloblastoma following osseous reconstruction – A review of twenty years. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009;37:36-41.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pogrel MA, Montes DM. Is there a role for enucleation in the management of ameloblastoma? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:807-12.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Jeremic JV, Nikolic ZS, Boricic IV, Tacevic ZD, Tomanovic NR, Drcic LJ, et al. Total mandibular reconstruction after resection of rare “honeycomb-like” ameloblastic carcinoma – A case report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010;38:465-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gilijamse M, Leemans CR, Winters HA, Schulten EA, van der Waal I. Metastasizing ameloblastoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:462-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Yoon HJ, Hong SP, Lee JI, Lee SS, Hong SD. Ameloblastic carcinoma: An analysis of 6 cases with review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:904-13.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nakamura N, Higuchi Y, Mitsuyasu T, Sandra F, Ohishi M. Comparison of long-term results between different approaches to ameloblastoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:13-20.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Benlyazid A, Lacroix-Triki M, Aziza R, Gomez-Brouchet A, Guichard M, Sarini J. Ameloblastic carcinoma of the maxilla: Case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:e17-24.  Back to cited text no. 10
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. João Ricardo Almeida Grossi
294, Tibagi St, Office 1605, Curitiba
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_623_16

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Outline of the Case
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1832    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded65    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal