| Abstract|| |
Anterior supernumerary teeth in the permanent dentition may be supplemental or rudimentary. Rudimentary types are further classified as conical, tuberculate, and molariform. The molariform type has been only rarely reported. We report a rare variety of anterior supernumerary teeth - the molariform type, occurring bilaterally and in association with a midline supernumerary tooth. We also suggest a hypothesis for the bilateral occurrence of supernumerary teeth.
Keywords: Anterior supernumerary teeth, bilateral, molariform type
|How to cite this article:|
Jain P, Kaul R, Saha S. Rare molariform supernumerary teeth: Why are they bilateral?. Indian J Dent Res 2017;28:702-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Jain P, Kaul R, Saha S. Rare molariform supernumerary teeth: Why are they bilateral?. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 May 28];28:702-5. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2017/28/6/702/221051
| Introduction|| |
Supernumerary teeth are defined as an excess number of teeth when compared with the normal dental formula. Their reported prevalence ranges between 0.3% and 0.8% in the primary dentition and 0.5% and 3.8% in the permanent dentition. Cases involving one or two supernumerary teeth occur in the maxilla 8.2–10 times more frequently than mandible, and as most commonly affect the premaxillary region. Cases involving multiple supernumeraries (more than five) have a predilection for the mandibular premolar region.
Primosch  classified anterior supernumerary teeth into two types (according to their shape):
- Supplemental - Eumorphic teeth of normal shape and size; also termed as incisiform. They appear most commonly as extra maxillary and mandibular lateral incisors in the permanent dentition and maxillary central incisors in the primary dentition
- Rudimentary - Dysmorphic teeth of abnormal shape and smaller size; includes conical, tuberculate, and molariform types.
Conical-shaped supernumerary teeth are the most common and occur as single, midline (mesiodens), or bilateral (mesiodentes) structures. The tuberculate type has a barrel-shaped appearance (width is equal to its length), a crown anatomy consisting of multiple tubercules, and either incomplete (stunted) or total absence of root formation. Finally, the molariform type  has derived its name because the crown closely resembles the morphology of a premolar. It is unique in that it appears to occur in pairs in the central incisor area and unlike the tuberculate type shows complete root formation. On literature search, there is abundant data on the prevalence of supplemental, conical, and tuberculate types of anterior supernumerary teeth; however, we could find only two studies , where the prevalence of molariform type has also been included. The prevalence ranges from 1.9% to 13.7%.
We report a case of a rare type of supernumerary teeth - the molariform type, occurring bilaterally and in association with a midline supernumerary tooth. We found no such case of concurrent occurrence of molariform teeth with other types of supernumerary teeth reported till date. We also suggest a hypothesis for the bilateral occurrence of supernumerary teeth.
| Case Report|| |
A 13-year-old female presented to our department with a chief complaint of forwardly placed anterior teeth. Medical and family histories were noncontributory.
On intraoral examination [Figure 1], three supernumerary teeth were noticed in the anterior maxillary region. One was a midline supernumerary tooth resembling an incisor. The other two were seen bilaterally. Both of them showed the presence of multiple lobes or tubercles with well-formed developmental grooves on the occlusal surface. Central incisors were displaced. Maxillary occlusal radiograph [Figure 2] revealed completely formed root of the midline supernumerary tooth. The maturity of bilateral supernumeraries was assessed by Cvek's classification  [Table 1] and recorded as Cvek's stage 4 for left supernumerary and stage 3 for right supernumerary teeth.
|Figure 1: Intraoral view showing three supernumerary teeth with displaced maxillary anteriors|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Maxillary occlusal radiograph showing stage of root formation of the supernumerary teeth|
Click here to view
Based on the clinical and radiographic examinations, the bilateral supernumerary teeth were diagnosed as the rare molariform type.
A comprehensive treatment plan was formulated. All the three supernumeraries were extracted [Figure 3] and [Figure 4], and the patient referred for fixed orthodontic treatment.
|Figure 3: Extracted supernumerary teeth showing presence of multiple lobes or tubercles with well-formed developmental grooves on the occlusal surface of the bilateral molariform teeth|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The etiology of supernumerary teeth is not completely understood. Several theories such as atavism theory, dichotomy theory, and dental lamina hyperactivity theory have been suggested to explain the development of supernumerary teeth. All these theories are hypothetical because of the inability to obtain sufficient embryologic material on the origin of hyperdontia.
Atavism theory  proposed that supernumerary teeth were the result of phylogenetic reversion to extinct primates with three pairs of incisors. Dichotomy theory  proposed that the tooth bud splits into two equal or different-sized parts, resulting in the formation of two teeth of equal size, or one normal and one dysmorphic tooth, respectively. Both atavism and dichotomy theories have been largely discounted.
Most of the literature support the dental lamina hyperactivity theory. This involves localized, independent, conditioned hyperactivity of the dental lamina. According to this theory, a supplemental form would develop from the lingual extension of an accessory tooth bud, whereas a rudimentary form would develop from the proliferation of epithelial remnants of the dental lamina.
Another theory is the genetic theory; evidence of which lies in the reports of mesiodens in twins, siblings, and sequential generations of a single family. Multiple supernumerary teeth can either be syndromic or nonsyndromic. When nonsyndromic, they may have a genetic component and are sometimes thought to represent a partial third dentition in humans.
Shapira and Lieberman  first reported the molariform type of supernumerary teeth as abnormally-shaped supernumerary maxillary incisors. Cases of molariform supernumerary teeth reported till date along with the hypothesis suggested by the authors have been tabulated in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Reported cases of molariform supernumerary teeth along with suggested hypothesis|
Click here to view
Study of organ morphogenesis reveals that the early primordia of most organs start in a symmetrical left-right position, but then asymmetries are superimposed in different ways - bending and rotation movements, asymmetric regression/persistence, and differential growth.
The entire primary dentition is initiated between the 6th and 8th weeks of embryonic development; and the successional permanent teeth are initiated between the 20th week in utero and the 10th month after birth.
It is probable that bilateral supernumerary teeth, especially the molariform type of supernumerary teeth arise not due to proliferation from dental lamina remnants at a later stage but rather as lingual extensions during the time when the molecular signals for the bilateral distribution of successional permanent tooth buds are active. They then develop concurrently with the natural permanent teeth and have complete root formation.
The midline supernumerary tooth reported in this case was perhaps because of fusion of two separately proliferating lingual extensions in the midline because of close approximation.
Differential expression of patterning genes is perhaps responsible for the difference in morphology of the supernumerary teeth. Further embryological investigations are required to know about the initiation time and patterning of different types of supernumerary teeth.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Rajab LD, Hamdan MA. Supernumerary teeth: Review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:244-54.
Açikgöz A, Açikgöz G, Tunga U, Otan F. Characteristics and prevalence of non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: A retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:185-90.
Primosch RE. Anterior supernumerary teeth – Assessment and surgical intervention in children. Pediatr Dent 1981;3:204-15.
Shapira Y, Lieberman MA. Abnormally-shaped supernumerary maxillary incisors. Angle Orthod 1974;44:322-5.
Anegundi RT, Tegginmani VS, Battepati P, Tavargeri A, Patil S, Trasad V, et al.
Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndromic South Indian pediatric population. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32:9-12.
] [Full text]
Fernández Montenegro P, Valmaseda Castellón E, Berini Aytés L, Gay Escoda C. Retrospective study of 145 supernumerary teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E339-44.
Cvek M, Andreasen JO, Borum MK. Healing of 208 intra-alveolar root fractures in patients aged 7-17 years. Dent Traumatol 2001;17:53-62.
Wang XP, Fan J. Molecular genetics of supernumerary tooth formation. Genesis 2011;49:261-77.
Carlson BM. Human Embryology and Developmental Biology. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
Tucker A, Sharpe P. The cutting-edge of mammalian development; how the embryo makes teeth. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5:499-508.
Marya CM, Kumar BR. Familial occurrence of mesiodentes with unusual findings: Case reports. Quintessence Int 1998;29:49-51.
Shashikiran ND, Reddy VV, Mandroli P. Molariform supernumerary tooth – A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2000;18:18-20.
Sharma A. Familial occurence of mesiodens – A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2003;21:84-5.
Srivatsan P, Aravindha Babu N. Mesiodens with an unusual morphology and multiple impacted supernumerary teeth in a non-syndromic patient. Indian J Dent Res 2007;18:138-40.
] [Full text]
Anegundi RT, Kaveri H, Patil SB, Punnya A. Double dens invaginatus in an impacted molariform supernumerary tooth: A unique case. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008;26 Suppl 1:S26-8.
Mangalekar SB, Ahmed T, Zakirulla M, Shivappa HS, Bheemappa FB, Yavagal C. Molariform mesiodens in primary dentition. Case Rep Dent 2013;2013:750107.
Indira M, Dhull KS, R S, Kumar Ps P, Devi Bm G. Molariform mesiodens in primary dentition: A case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZD33-5.
Özden MC, Tayşi M, Cankaya AB, Yildirim MS. Bilateral molariform supernumerary teeth in the anterior maxilla: A report of two cases. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent 2017;51:57-60.
Dr. Parul Jain
Flat No. 609, 6th Floor, Triveni Mansion, 249 H, Grand Trunk Road (North), Liluah, Howrah - 711 204, Kolkata, West Bengal
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2]