Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 727

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Table of Contents   
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 59-65
Morphology of root canal surface: A reflection on the process of cementation of the composite relined glass fiber post


1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
2 Department of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
3 Department of Materials Engineering, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
4 Department of Dentistry, Sao Leopoldo Mandic Dental School, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Yasmine Mendes Pupo
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Parana - UFPR, Av. Prefeito Lothario Meissner 632, Jardim Botanico, CEP:80210-170 Curitiba/PR
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_189_16

Rights and Permissions

Background: The present study was conducted to evaluate the bond strength in the different root thirds (premolars and maxillary central incisors) ofcomposite relined glass fiber posts compared to untreated glass fiber posts cemented with dual-or chemical-cure cements. Materials and Methods: Sixty human single-rooted premolars(flat canal)(n=15) and 12maxillary central incisors were used (round canal)(n=3). The teeth were sectioned, and the roots received endodontic treatment. The standardized preparation of the canals was carried out, and the roots were randomly divided into four groups according to the cementation systems: G1: cemented posts (dual: Ambar/Allcem); G2: relined posts(dual: Ambar/Allcem); G3: cemented posts(chemical: Fusion Duralink/Cement Post); and G4: relined posts(chemical: Fusion Duralink/Cement Post). The roots were cut to give two slices of each third of the root canal per specimen. Push-out test was conducted at a speed of 0.5mm/min. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups for the premolars(flat canal)(P=0.959). There was a significant difference in the central incisors between the middle and apical thirds in the cemented group when using the dual system(P=0.04) and between the middle and apical thirds(P=0.003) and cervical and apical thirds(P=0.033) when using the chemical system. Conclusion: Due to the anatomy of the root canal, flat canal of the premolars does not require relining, but round canal of the maxillary central incisors demands it for more secure in the bond strength.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article

 
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1506    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded55    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal