Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 2198

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL RESEARCH  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 544-546
Prevalence of idiopathic osteosclerosis in an Iranian population


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission13-Dec-2015
Date of Decision10-Jan-2016
Date of Acceptance26-Aug-2016
Date of Web Publication13-Dec-2016
 

   Abstract 

Aim: Idiopathic osteosclerosis (IO) is a localized radiopacity with no associated pain, bony expansion, symptom, or known etiology. The aim of this study was to assess its frequency and distribution according to its location and patient's age and gender and internal structure using panoramic radiography.
Subjects and Methods: In this retrospective study, 3975 panoramic radiographs (PRs) were used. Radiopaque regions which had no certain relationship to any known sources of hard tissue production were accepted as IO and characteristics such as shape, location, internal structure, and personal information were investigated.
Statistical Analysis Used: The obtained data were evaluated using SPSS software and Chi-square test.
Results: IO was found in 113 (2.84%) out of 3975 patients. The most frequent site was the posterior region of mandible. There was no significant difference in the incidence of IO between genders (P = 0.766).
Conclusion: IO is an asymptomatic radiopaque mass commonly seen in PR, which was found mostly in the first molar region of mandible. Furthermore, its maximum frequency was in the second decade.

Keywords: Idiopathic osteosclerosis, jaw, panoramic radiography

How to cite this article:
Naser AZ, Roshanzamir N. Prevalence of idiopathic osteosclerosis in an Iranian population. Indian J Dent Res 2016;27:544-6

How to cite this URL:
Naser AZ, Roshanzamir N. Prevalence of idiopathic osteosclerosis in an Iranian population. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 12];27:544-6. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2016/27/5/544/195679
Idiopathic osteosclerosis (IO) is an area seen as an irregular radiopacity. [1],[2] Although sometimes described as a dense bone island or enostosis, IO is often preferred. [3] These lesions are expected as developmental intraosseous anatomic variations. [4],[5],[6] IO is variable in size [Figure 1], even sometimes including the whole body of mandible. [1],[2],[3],[4],[7],[8]
Figure 1: A sample of osteosclerosis

Click here to view


Lesions may occur at root apices or between roots or may be separate from teeth. [3],[9],[10] Histopathologically, IO is composed of dense calcified tissues without marrow spaces and noninflammatory cell infiltrates. [9],[11] There is a possible predilection for African, Japanese, Chinese, or indo-Chinese people; [4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] therefore, it was necessary to do proper research in Iranian society.


   Subjects and methods Top


In this retrospective, descriptive, analytical study, 3975 panoramic radiographs (PRs) were selected from patients (1987 men and 1988 women) aged between 10 and 45 years old who were referred to Isfahan Dental School for routine dental examination. All radiographs were observed by a radiologist on a standard light box under normal room lighting to detect the presence of IO. All the PRs were obtained with a panoramic X-ray machine (Planmeca, EC, Finland) and Kodak film (Kodak, USA) and processed in an automatic film processor (Optimax, Germany).

Patients who had questionable situation about the existence of IO and had the following criteria were excluded from this study:

  • Radiopacities which were directly related to teeth with deep caries or large restorations;
  • Characteristics associated with complex lesions such as periapical cemental dysplasia, odontoma, and fibro-osseous lesions;
  • Remaining roots of primary or permanent teeth in the jaw which are clearly distinguishable;
  • Radiopacities related to salivary gland stones, exostoses, lymph node calcifications, and tonsillitis (according to radiographic and clinical characteristics of the lesions);
  • Radiopacities around malpositioned teeth or long-term abutments for fixed bridges or partial dentures, which may have thickened lamina dura;
  • Patients with Gardner's syndrome, familial polyposis, and other diseases associated with metabolic bone disorders;
  • Solitary radiopacities in edentulous regions.
Statistical analysis

The observed results were analyzed with SPSS 15 (IBM Com., Chicago, USA), and data were obtained using the Chi-square test to investigate the possible relationship between the findings and gender, age, and location, and the amount of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant level.


   Results Top


Osteosclerosis was identified in 113 of 3975 patients (1987 men and 1988 women), for an overall incidence of 2.84% of patients. There is a statistically significant difference between the rates of occurrence in the jaws (P < 0.001); only 4 IOs were detected in maxilla and the rest of them occurred in the mandible (96.5%). There were 113 cases of osteosclerosis that consisted of 57 cases (50/4%) among females and 56 (49/5%) among males. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of IO between men and women (P = 0.766).

The ages of the study group ranged from 10 to 45 years, and most lesions were found in the second decade [Chart 1].



Furthermore, most lesions were formed in the posterior area of maxilla and mandible, and the most common location of IO was in the mandibular molar and then mandibular premolar region.


   Discussion Top


In this study, the prevalence of IO was 2.84%. This result was consistent with the findings of Miloglu et al. in Turkey (2.4%) and also with Avramidou et al. in Greece (1.96%). [6],[12] Although comparing to the results of most researches, shows lower incidence in the studied population. [1],[13],[14],[15]

One of the reasons for the variation in the studies is the different definitions of osteosclerosis. Some researchers included radiopacities that are related to traumatic occlusion or pulpal inflammation, whereas others excluded these kinds of lesions from their study. [13],[14] In our study, asymptomatic radiopaque masses within the jaws which had no certain relationship to any known sources of hard tissue production were accepted as IO. Another reason may be the choice of radiography. In some studies, periapical radiographs were examined, [1],[13] whereas in some others, PRs were used as the tool of investigation. [2],[5],[14] Yonetsu et al. after studying 11 cases with the panoramic radiography also evaluated the cases with computed tomography and reported that the accuracy of panoramic radiography is suitable. [14] However, at least we have to accept that theoretically structures outside the image layer of panoramic imaging will not have proper features in the final film. In our study, to maintain ethical issues, no radiographs were taken from the patients; instead, radiographs prescribed by other sections were used and because intraoral periapical radiographs usually do not include full mouth, we used panoramic views to have a full view and wide range for research.

In our study, the prevalence of lesion among men and women is almost equal and had no significant difference. Although some studies have described a higher incidence in women, [3],[6],[13],[16] most studies have observed no significant difference between men and women. [10],[14],[17],[18],[19]

In our study, a higher incidence of IO is seen in the mandible which is consistent with the findings of all previous studies, [2],[3],[6],[9],[12],[13],[17],[20],[21] and also the dental location of IO in our study is mostly in the first molar area, which is different with the results of some studies. In the studies of Geist and Katz in America and Zhang in China as well as Miloglu et al., IO was found to be most prevalent in the premolar region of the mandible. [6],[13],[15] The majority of the articles suggest that the main area involved in the IO lesions is mandibular molars. [8],[14],[22],[23] This might partly be explained by the fact that when PRs are examined and assessed, there are fewer problems with the superimposition of anatomic structures in the mandible than in the maxilla. In addition, it may be attributed to differences in bone anatomy and blood supply. [12]

In our study, IO is almost absent in the first decade, whereas in the second decade, we observed the greatest amount of IO probably due to the pubic stage of head and face bones and then declined in the third and fourth decade. In this respect, our findings are consistent with the results of Kawai in Japan and MacDonald-Jankowski in Hong Kong and the Western race living in that region. [10],[21]

In these studies, the maximum incidence is related to the second decade and decreases with aging. However, in MacDonald-Jankowski's study, Eastern race living in Hong Kong had the highest incidence of IO in the fourth decade. [21] Furthermore, Miloglu et al. in Turkey found during their study that the highest incidence of IO is in the third and fourth decades. [6] These differences probably show the role of genetic as one of the main elements in the different prevalence of IO in different populations. Furthermore, all of these studies have noted decrease of IO incidence with increasing age. [6],[10],[19] At the end, no incidence of IO in the first decade and then beginning of it in the second decade at the time of final mineralization of bone reinforces the hypothesis that IO is a normal variation in bone growth.


   Conclusion Top


The review of different articles and the results of this study showed IO is a developmental variation of normal bone structure unrelated to any regional stimuli. The lesion occurs at any age, any location, without a sex predilection, and often does not require treatment. In this study, most lesions were homogeneous, irregular, and distinct from the apex of the tooth. To ensure the accuracy of diagnosis, periodic follow-up of the lesion is necessary. [4]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Halse A, Molven O. Idiopathic osteosclerosis of the jaws followed through a period of 20-27 years. Int Endod J 2002;35:747-51.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sisman Y, Ertas ET, Ertas H, Sekerci AE. The frequency and distribution of idiopathic osteosclerosis of the jaw. Eur J Dent 2011;5:409-14.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
McDonnell D. Dense bone island. A review of 107 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76:124-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bsoul SA, Alborz S, Terezhalmy GT, Moore WS. Idiopathic osteosclerosis (enostosis, dense bone silands, focal periapical osteopetrosis). Quintessence Int 2004;35:590-1.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Misirlioglu M, Nalcaci R, Baran I, Adisen MZ, Yilmaz S. A possible association of idiopathic osteosclerosis with excessive occlusal forces. Quintessence Int 2014;45:251-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Miloglu O, Yalcin E, Buyukkurt MC, Acemoglu H. The frequency and characteristics of idiopathic osteosclerosis and condensing osteitis lesions in a Turkish patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:e640-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Austin BW, Moule AJ. A comparative study of the prevalence of mandibular osteosclerosis in patients of Asiatic and Caucasian origin. Aust Dent J 1984;29:36-43.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
White S, Pharoah M. Benign tumors of the jaws. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 6 th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 366-404.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Eversole LR, Stone CE, Strub D. Focal sclerosing osteomyelitis/focal periapical osteopetrosis: Radiographic patterns. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:456-60.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kawai T, Hirakuma H, Murakami S, Fuchihata H. Radiographic investigation of idiopathic osteosclerosis of the jaws in Japanese dental outpatients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:237-42.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Nakano K, Ogawa T, Sobue S, Ooshima T. Dense bone island: Clinical features and possible complications. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:433-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Avramidou FM, Markou E, Lambrianidis T. Cross-sectional study of the radiographic appearance of radiopaque lesions of the jawbones in a sample of Greek dental patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:e38-43.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Geist JR, Katz JO. The frequency and distribution of idiopathic osteosclerosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:388-93.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Yonetsu K, Yuasa K, Kanda S. Idiopathic osteosclerosis of the jaws: Panoramic radiographic and computed tomographic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:517-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zhang ZL. Radiographic investigation of idiopathic osteosclerosis of jaws. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 1994;3:200-2.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Moshfeghi M, Azimi F, Anvari M. Radiologic assessment and frequency of idiopathic osteosclerosis of jawbones: An interpopulation comparison. Acta Radiol 2014;55:1239-44.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Farman AG, de V Joubert JJ, Nortjé CJ. Focal osteosclerosis and apical periodontal pathoses in "European" and Cape coloured dental outpatients. Int J Oral Surg 1978;7:549-57.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wood N, Goaz P. Differential Diagnosis of Oral Lesions. 5 th ed. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1980.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Verzak Z, Celap B, Modric VE, Soric P, Karlovic Z. The prevalence of idiopathic osteosclerosis and condensing osteitis in Zagreb population. Acta Clin Croat 2012;51:573-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Noujeim M, Bsoul S, Huber M. Unusual presentation of idiopathic osteosclerosis: A case report. Gen Dent 2008;56:182-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS. Idiopathic osteosclerosis in the jaws of Britons and of the Hong Kong Chinese: Radiology and systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:357-63.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Fireman SM. Osteosclerotic lesions of the jaws. Oral Health 1976;66:27-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Garau V, Deschino A, Piras D, Cotti E. Idiopathic osteosclerosis in jaw bones. Clinical statistic study on a population of Sardinian origin. Minerva Stomatol 2002;51:377-83.  Back to cited text no. 23
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Najmeh Roshanzamir
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.195679

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Subjects and methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1040    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded50    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal