Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 1467

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 445-449
Surgical correction of severe enophthalmos caused by bullet injury


Director and Consultant, Balaji Dental and Craniofacial Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission26-Jul-2016
Date of Decision19-Sep-2016
Date of Acceptance20-Sep-2016
Date of Web Publication10-Oct-2016
 

   Abstract 

Ballistic injuries of oral and maxillofacial region are usually fatal due to close propinquity with the vital structures. The severity of injury depends on the caliber of the weapon used and distance from which the patient is shot. The preliminary care of facial ballistic wounds strictly adheres to the basics of trauma resuscitation. Early and appropriate surgical management has proved to be influential on the final outcome and esthetic result. Treatment of facial gunshot wounds should be planned and carried out carefully to avoid esthetic complications. It takes even multiple-staged corrections to achieve the targeted functional and esthetic treatment plan. Prevention and control of infection is one of the most important goals to achieve the success of the treatment. Herewith, we present a case of facial gunshot injury with fractures in the orbital floor, medial wall maxillary sinus, and buttress of the zygomatic bone causing deficit, which was successfully managed by surgical reconstruction.

Keywords: Bullet injury, enophthalmos, gunshot injury, orbital floor, titanium mesh

How to cite this article:
Balaji S M. Surgical correction of severe enophthalmos caused by bullet injury. Indian J Dent Res 2016;27:445-9

How to cite this URL:
Balaji S M. Surgical correction of severe enophthalmos caused by bullet injury. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 May 28];27:445-9. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2016/27/4/445/191898
Gunshot wounds have been previously classified as penetrating, perforating, and avulsive. [1] Penetrating wounds are caused when a projectile enters the victim but does not exit. Perforating wounds are caused when a projectile enters and exits the victim. Avulsive wounds are caused when the projectile enters the victim and exits with substantial loss of tissue. In our case, the patient had perforating type of wounds where he had entry wound through the occipital region and exist wound through the orbit.


   Case Report Top


A 26-year-old male who worked as a soldier in the army in the Middle East reported with an accidental gunshot injury on the right side of the face and needed correction of the resultant deformity. History revealed that 20 days back, the patient was struck by a stray bullet while returning from his military camp. The bullet had entered through the nape of the neck and exited through the right orbital floor. He had been immediately hospitalized and underwent emergency surgery under general anesthesia. He reported that he underwent external carotid ligation at the level of neck and bullet extraction to control the profuse bleeding from the injury with no primary bony reconstruction except for the soft tissue redraping. The major blood vessels such as internal carotid artery and the jugular vessels were not damaged. Postsurgical history of loss of consciousness and vomiting were not observed.

On examination, a mild periorbital swelling and scars were evident near the right nasolabial fold and lower eyelid skin. The right eye had no alteration in vision. He had diplopia, enophthalmos, and hypoglobus with orbital dystopia. On palpation, there was paresthesia of the right infraorbital nerve dermatome. There was deficiency of bone palpable in the right inferior orbital rim and anterior wall of maxilla. Further, computed tomography imaging studies revealed fracture with bony deficit in the orbital floor, medial wall maxillary sinus, and buttress of the zygomatic bone. An arteriogram done on his carotid system revealed no abnormality. An angiography was done to detect any dormant aneurysm [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4].
Figure 1: (a) Immediate postoperative view after primary management, bullet extraction, and wound closure. (b) Entry wound appearing as a beveled oval wound. (c) Preoperative computed tomography showing comminuted fracture and bony deficit involving the right orbital floor, infraorbital rim, and zygomaticomaxillary butress. (d) Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a and b) Preoperative view showing enopthalmus, hypoglobus, dystopia, and a scar in the right infraorbital region

Click here to view
Figure 3: (a) Orbital approach through the preexisting scar. Note the titanium mesh used for orbital floor reconstruction. (b) Orbital floor reconstructed with titanium mesh. (c and d) Harvesting of rib graft

Click here to view
Figure 4: (a) Infraorbital rim reconstructed using rib graft. (b) Postoperative view showing corrected enophthalmos and hypoglobus. (c) Preoperative worm's eye view. (d) Postoperative worm's eye view showing enophthalmos and hypoglobus

Click here to view


Path of the bullet

The bullet entered through the nape of the neck damaging the trapezius, semispinalis capitis, and splenius capitis muscles. The bullet would have supposedly traversed across the neck through the infratemporal fossa exiting through the infraorbital region damaging the floor of the orbit, infraorbital rim, and maxillary sinus buttress. The  entrance wound may be characterized by the "keyhole" effect. Such a wound results from a bullet striking the skull at an angle [Figure 5]. This effect may be in accordance with Berryman who stated that "as the bullet advances, fragments produced by radiating fractures become elevated, and connecting fractures form perpendicular to the radiating fractures. Bone fragments delimited by these fractures are propelled outward as the bullet passes through." The end result is a wound resembling a keyhole. The bullet narrowly missed the brainstem and skull base including major blood vessels such as the internal carotid artery and the jugular vessels. The cause of profuse uncontrolled bleeding could be from the highly vascular region of infratemporal fossa-pterygoid venous plexus and maxillary artery. [2]
Figure 5: (a) Three-dimensional computed tomography showing persumed path of bullet shown in red arrow irst hitting the zygomaticomaxillary butress producing radiating fractures extending till the orbital floor and the infraorbital rim. (b) Persumed path of bullet eyhole effect

Click here to view


Surgical procedure

Under general anesthesia, through a preexisting scar in the right infraorbital rim, the infraorbital region was explored. The orbital floor was shattered with multiple small fracture fragments as evident beyond fixation. The potentially vascular fracture fragments were removed to avoid infection. A soft tissue pocket was created inferior to the globe for the placement of a graft to reconstruct the orbital floor. A titanium mesh was contoured, positioned, and adapted to the floor and rim fixing the mesh at the lateral orbital rim. A costochondral graft was harvested and contoured according to the need. The graft was used to reconstruct the infraorbital rim and the orbital floor. The defect was thus reconstructed, and the globe of the eye was elevated to the level of the contralateral eye. The wound was closed in layers after excising the scar.


   Discussion Top


The most common types of firearm used are handguns, rifles, and shotguns. Handguns fire low-caliber projectiles (lead or lead alloy) at a low velocity (<2000 feet/s). Rifles fire low-to-high-caliber projectiles at a high velocity (>2000 feet/s). A shotgun is a long gun that may fire a single pellet or hundreds of pellets at a low velocity. [3]

Bullets crush structures along its track, causing temporary cavitation, shearing, and compression, sometimes tears the structures (as with solid abdominal viscera) or stretches inelastic tissue (the brain). As tissues recoil and hot gases dissipate, soft tissue collapses inward, and hence a permanent cavity is formed. In addition, kinetic energy transfer occurs during retardation of the velocity of the bullet and this may cause damage outside the tract. Factors influencing the efficiency of kinetic energy transfer include the kinetic energy of a body, proportional to mass and velocity, projectile's deformation and fragmentation, entrance profile and path travelled through the body, and biological characteristics of the tissues. [4]

The maxillofacial gunshot injuries are associated with a high mortality rate. The severity of these injuries varies depending on the caliber of the weapon used, distance, and the mass and velocity of bullet (low velocity, <1000 feet/s and high velocity, >2000 feet/s). High-velocity injuries have traditionally been assumed to cause more damage than low-velocity ones have, an assumption that is still under dispute. A close-range, high-velocity gunshot wound can result in devastating facial disfigurement and disability in those who survive.

Shape of the wound of entrance (WOE) may be circular or oval. The WOE is circular when the bullet strikes the body surface perpendicularly. When the bullet strikes the body at an angle, the WOE is oval. WOE is everted with protrusion of fatty tissue through the wound. The margin is irregular. In shorter distance, wound of exit is larger than the wound of entry, whereas at a longer distance, the wound of exit is slightly smaller than the  WOE. In our case, the oval entry wound with more destruction in the exit wound suggests that the bullet enters at an angle from short distance [Figure 6]. [5]
Figure 6: Shape of entry wound depending on the angle of bullet entry

Click here to view


Beveling may occur indicating the direction of fire. Symmetrical beveling at the entrance wound suggests that the shot was made at a 90° angle.  Whereas asymmetrical beveling indicates a shot made at an angle. Certain parts of the skull, such as the temporal and facial bones, are thin and therefore do not bevel. [6] Bullet rotation may also help create external beveling at the entrance site although this explanation seems unlikely, given that a bullet does not spin much as it perforates the skull.

As the projectile enters the victim, the different layers of tissue react according to their specific properties. Injuries to the dermis include abrasion, impaction of particulate matter, and contusion. At closer ranges, burning and implantation of powder and residue may occur and may result in a tattoo. After the projectile passes through the skin, it next encounters muscle tissue, which is very elastic and may sustain deformation of as much as four times the diameter of the projectile. On a cellular level, the muscle along the pathway of the projectile becomes devitalized and necrotic.

As the projectile travels, it may also encounter other surrounding vital structures such as nerves and blood vessels. The injuries to neurovascular tissue are similar to injuries to muscle. Vessels may be ruptured, crushed, or sheared, and spasm may occur. These injuries may result in hemorrhage and in the formation of thrombi and hematoma. On a cellular level, damage occurs to all the three layers of the vessel wall. [3] Sensory and motor nerves may be damaged. When sensory nerves stretch, anesthesia and paraesthesia result; when motor nerves stretch, there is a result of conduction deficit and loss of function.

Injury to bony tissue differs from injury to soft tissues. The minimal projectile velocity required for bone fracture is 65 m/s. Bone is very inelastic; therefore, the type of injury that occurs depends on the type of bone encountered by the projectile. Injury to cancellous bone usually results in a defect of the drill-hole type. Injury to cortical bone or teeth usually results in shattering. The resulting fragments may act as secondary projectiles and may pose an aspiration risk. [5]

Bullet injuries are most severe in friable solid organs (e.g., liver and brain) where damage may be caused by temporary cavitation (tissue stretch) remote from the actual bullet track. [7] Dense tissue (e.g., bone) and loose tissue (e.g., subcutaneous fat) are more resistant to bullet injury. Bone modifies the behavior of bullets markedly by altering their course, creating a tumbling effect, slowing them down, and increasing deformity and fragmentation. [7],[8] Evaluation of bone injuries and the distribution of bone and bullet fragments on radiographs can be helpful in determining the direction of travel, which is important not only for clinical assessment but also for forensic evaluation of the incident. [9]

The presence of a full or partial metal jacket has a major effect on deformity. Bullets with full metal jackets often remain in one piece and usually do not deform much. These projectiles typically do not leave a trial of lead fragments along their path. On the other hand, semi jacketed, hollow point, nonjacketed soft point bullets tend to deform on impact or break apart, leaving a telltale trail of metal fragments through the soft tissue. [10]

The first procedure in definitive maxillofacial management of a gunshot injury is to irrigate the wound with normal saline. Irrigation debrides any necrotic tissue, removes foreign bodies, and brings the contaminants to nonpathogenic concentrations. Simple cutaneous wounds may be cleansed and dressed with bacitracin or sulfadiazine cream 1%. Shattered bone and teeth along with debris should be removed under copious irrigation. Injuries resulting in active hemorrhage should be explored and repaired at the earliest. At the time of hemorrhage control, obvious nerve damage should also be repaired.

Orbital injuries should be managed with attention to form and function. The spectrum of eye injuries may possibly vary from very mild to extremely serious, resulting in blindness. Early attention should be paid to vision and ocular motility. When an eye is severely damaged, it may be necessary to remove it surgically. The most common procedures are evisceration (removal of the contents of the eye except the sclera and extraocular muscles) or enucleation (removal of the eye itself) and exenteration, which is the most radical of the three procedures and involves removal of the eye, adnexa, and part of the bony orbit.

Nerve damage, particularly to the facial and trigeminal nerves, can be expected after severe gunshot wounds to the face. The damage caused by either the direct injury or the blast effect generally prevents immediate reconstruction. [11]

In the present case, the patient was shot from the back in the occipital region and the bullet exit wound is in the orbit. The fractured floor was reconstructed successfully by titanium mesh plate. The patient escaped from injury to any vital structure which provided him a very good prognosis with functional and esthetic rehabilitation.


   Conclusion Top


Firearm injuries have become very common with the increasing availability and use of ammunitions by individuals in domestic violence and homicide. Gunshot wounds in oral and maxillofacial region often present with frightful deformity. The type of injury is dependent on the type of the projectile and the energy of the impact. Prevention and control of infection is important in the outcome of the treatment success. Knowledge about the primary management of the cases is very important as it could be lifesaving as well as facilitates secondary correction by surgical or prosthetic means. Most of the patients require secondary correction of the facial deformities or replacement of lost body parts, most often the eye. The basic principles of surgery followed logically can effectively rehabilitate the unfortunate victims of war and domestic violence.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Kelly JF. Management of War Injuries to the Jaws and Related Structures. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1977. p. 36.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Berryman HE, Smith OC, Symes SA. Diameter of cranial gunshot wounds as a function of bullet caliber. J Forensic Sci 1995;40:751-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
National Rifle Association of America. NRA Firearms Fact Book. 3 rd ed. Washington, DC: National Rifle Association Publications; 1989.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Newgard K. The physiological effects of handgun bullets: The mechanisms of wounding and incapacitation. Wound Ballist Rev 1992;1:7-12.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ordog GJ, editor. Wound ballistics. Management of Gunshot Wounds. New York: Elsevier; 1988.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Oehmichen M, Meissner C, König HG. Brain injury after gunshot wounding: Morphometric analysis of cell destruction caused by temporary cavitation. J Neurotrauma 2000;17:155-62.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Wilson AJ. Gunshot injuries: What does a radiologist need to know? Radiographics 1999;19:1358-68.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Swan KG, Swan RC. Principles of ballistics applicable to the treatment of gunshot wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1991;71:221-39.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Choi CH, Pritchard J, Richard J. Path of bullet and injuries determined by radiography. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1990;11:244-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Phillips CD. Emergent radiologic evaluation of the gunshot wound victim. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:307-24.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Stiernberg CM, Jahrsdoerfer RA, Gillenwater A, Joe SA, Alcalen SV. Gunshot wounds to the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:592-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
S M Balaji
Director and Consultant, Balaji Dental and Craniofacial Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.191898

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2614    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded70    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal