Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 1614

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
Table of Contents   
EDITORIAL  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 225
Publication ethics: Whose responsibility?


Executive Editor, n Journal of Dental Research, Director and Consultant Maxillofacial Surgeon, Balaji Dental Hospital, Teynampet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication14-Aug-2015
 

How to cite this article:
Balaji S M. Publication ethics: Whose responsibility?. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26:225

How to cite this URL:
Balaji S M. Publication ethics: Whose responsibility?. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 May 28];26:225. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2015/26/3/225/162876
Publication ethics or self-imposed moral code of conduct during the publication process transcends legal boundaries. In scholarly publication, an author, by submitting a manuscript is assumed to promise that:

  • It is original work
  • It is not being submitted or under active consideration in any other journal
  • All guidelines of the journal have been followed and adhered too.


When this is the scenario, most of the journals ask at least two independent referees for an opinion. Based on their inputs, the section editor takes an informed decision, and in consultation with the editorial board a final decision is arrived at.

Usually in Indian setting, checking the manuscript for plagiarism is supposedly at several levels - at the time of submission; by the referee; by the section editors; and by the technical editing team. In situations, especially in narrative reviews, inadvertently or intentionally a large section of text may be incorporated into the manuscript.[1] At this juncture, whose error is this? Is it the authors? Editors? Referees?

There have been several such "inadvertent" errors that have crept in. Quite recently, in an interesting review manuscript in aerospace - dental biology, several passages were supposedly plagiarized.[2] The circumstances and the communications, in which the episode unfolds evoke this discussion. For this situation, who is to be blamed? All the authors, the corresponding author, the section editor, the editor-in-chief, the anonymous referees, or the copy/technical editors? Who stands to the share the blame?

From the point of submission of a manuscript to the publication, a huge amount of finance, technical expertise, and most importantly time are being involved. When a manuscript is "retracted" a huge wastage of resources, as well as credentials, go down.

As a part of the system, I suggest a solution. In this situation, when in doubt, especially with language or plagiarism related issue, it would be prudent for the authors to check their final manuscript with the numerous online professional, automatic language, and plagiarism checking services. For a few dollars, this automated services provides an in-depth solution. For a nonnative English speaker, an added advantage would be the English correction service available in this package. Had the authors involved utilized one of such services, which to my best of belief, would have solved the problem at bud itself.

In the best interest of science and research, all stakeholders need to discharge their responsibilities keeping science as their priority.







 
   References Top

1.
Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:17028-33.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.

Top
Correspondence Address:
S M Balaji
Executive Editor, n Journal of Dental Research, Director and Consultant Maxillofacial Surgeon, Balaji Dental Hospital, Teynampet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.162876

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1266    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded126    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal