Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 643

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Table of Contents   
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 484-487
Maxillary repositioning according to Frankfort horizontal plane during orthognathic surgery


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Dariush Hasheminia
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.118395

Rights and Permissions

Context: There are a lot of disagreements among surgeons over controlling the maxillary position during orthognathic surgery. Aim: To investigate maxillary repositioning according to Frankfort horizontal plane in orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients were selected who were submitted to maxillary or bimaxillary surgery. Maxillary model surgery was performed based on the treatment planning and an intermediate splint was made. The surgical technique in this study was based on maxillary osteotomy according to the findings of the model surgery, in a manner that the osteotomy line was parallel to the Frankfort horizontal plane. Intermediate splint was used for repositioning of the maxilla in the new position and the vertical position of that was determined according to external reference point and fixed on this position. The upper central incisor designed from prediction tracing and post-operative cephalometry on the first tracing. The new position of maxilla was evaluated horizontally and vertically. Statistical Analysis Used: A paired t-test was used to compare the predicted maxillary position and the actual position. Association between these two groups of variables was evaluated with Pearson correlation. Results: The mean difference between the maxillary planned position and post-operative cephalometric radiography varied between 0.3 mm and 0.9 mm vertically (P value = 0.315) and 0.0 mm and 0.9 mm horizontally (P value = 0.034). The averages of horizontally and vertically observed changes were 0.3 mm and 0.17 mm respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Good surgical accuracy in repositioning of the maxilla can be achieved according to Frankfort horizontal plane during the surgery. By eliminating the ramping effect the accuracy of surgery increases.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article

 
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2034    
    Printed54    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded94    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal