Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 1956

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL RESEARCH  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 395-396
Sarjeev's supernumerary tooth notation system: A universally compatible add-on to the Two-Digit system


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Afzalgunj, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, YMT Dental Collage and Hospital Khargahar, Navi Mumbai, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission05-Jul-2011
Date of Decision14-Dec-2012
Date of Acceptance30-Jan-2013
Date of Web Publication12-Sep-2013
 

   Abstract 

Aim: To give notation for quadrants, tooth position, and the type of supernumerary teeth for both permanent and deciduous dentition. Tooth numbering provides dentists with an essential shortcut in clinical record keeping.
Materials and Methods: Three systems are favored worldwide: the Zsigmondy/Palmer system, the Universal system, and the Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) Two-Digit system. Histories of all tooth-numbering methods were traced and the strengths and deficiencies of each system were reviewed. The FDI Two-Digit system is widely used throughout the world, except USA, and is the only method that makes the visual sense, cognitive sense, and computer sense.
Conclusion: On review it was noticed that all tooth notation systems in vogue have a drawback as they do not provide any information or notations for supernumerary teeth such as paramolar, distomolar, mesiodens, and fused teeth.

Keywords: Army system, Bosworth system, distomolar, fused teeth, Haderup′s system, Navy system, Sarjeev′s supernumerary tooth notation system, Two-Digit notation, Universal notation, Zsigmondy/Palmer notation

How to cite this article:
Yadav SS, Sonkurla S. Sarjeev's supernumerary tooth notation system: A universally compatible add-on to the Two-Digit system. Indian J Dent Res 2013;24:395-6

How to cite this URL:
Yadav SS, Sonkurla S. Sarjeev's supernumerary tooth notation system: A universally compatible add-on to the Two-Digit system. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2013 [cited 2017 Apr 25];24:395-6. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2013/24/3/395/118009
Dentists, in writing or speech, use several different dental notation systems for associating information to a specific tooth. The various common systems are the Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) World Dental Federation notation, [1] the Universal numbering system (dental), [2] Haderup's system, the Army system, the Navy system, the Zsigmondy/Palmer notation method, [3] and Bosworth system. [4] The FDI system is in vogue worldwide and the Universal notation system is more popular in USA.

The FDI World Dental Federation notation is widely used by dentists internationally to associate information to a specific tooth. Developed by Dr. J. Viohal and accepted by FDI in 1971, the World Dental Federation notation is also known as ISO 3950 notation. [5] It allows everyone in an oral health team to efficiently share information among him or her and further provides those outside the team with clear and precise information about their work. In addition, the FDI Two-Digit notation system is widely used to record information on a patient's situation.

All notation systems introduced so far have been used as per local needs and convenience, but all the notation systems have one drawback in common, which is they does not provide any information and/or notation for supernumerary or fused teeth, etc.

The majority of supernumerary teeth are considered to develop as a result of horizontal proliferation or hyperactivity of the permanent or deciduous dental lamina. [6] Supernumerary teeth are classified according to location and morphology. [7]

Multiple supernumerary teeth are rare in individuals with no other associated diseases or syndromes. [8] According to studies performed so far, 3.1% of males and 2.6% of females [9] have supernumerary and fused teeth, and the incidence of these abnormal or extra teeth is increasing due genetic mutations, and environmental and local conditions. The incidence of supernumerary teeth varies between 0.45 and 3%, depending on the literature source, and is more common in females than in males (proportion 2:1). [10],[11] Although such teeth may be found in any region of the dental arch, they are more commonly located on the maxillary midline where they are referred to as mesiodens, representing 80% of all supernumerary teeth. [12],[13] This location is followed in decreasing order of frequency by four molars or upper distomolars; upper paramolars; and - proportionately far behind - by lower premolars, upper lateral incisors, lower fourth molars, and lower central incisors. Upper premolars are exceptional, as are upper and lower canines and lower lateral incisors. [14] The incidence of supernumerary teeth in different locations is increasing worldwide and there are no notation systems to address these increasing incidences.

Thus, to overcome the drawback and to have notations for these extra components of the human dentition, Sarjeev's supernumerary notation system was devised to satisfy the increasing need and requirement of a notation system for other than normal supernumerary teeth in the human dentition.

The orientation of the chart is traditionally "dentist's view", that is, patient's right corresponds to notation chart's left. The designations "left" and "right" on the chart, however, nonetheless correspond to the patient's left and right, respectively.


   Chart of Codes Top


1. FDI World Dental Federation notation



2. Zsigmondy/Palmer notation method

This is the oldest method, introduced in 1861. Also called Palmer's notation.



3. Haderup's system



4. Universal system

This notation system is approved by ADA, widely used in USA. Even though it includes all permanent and deciduous teeth, it does not have notation system for supernumerary teeth.



5. Army system



6. Navy system



7. Bosworth system



Supernumerary teeth

Paramolar [Figure 1] - It is a supernumerary molar usually small and rudimentary, situated buccally or palatally to one of the maxillary molars, or in the inter-proximal space buccal to the second and third molars. [15]
Figure 1: A paramolar on maxillary left second molar, that is, β6p

Click here to view


Distomolar [Figure 2]a and b - A supernumerary tooth located behind the third molar, [16] and if third molar is missing, there is evidence of a distomolar to the distal aspect of the distal-most permanent tooth of the arch.
Figure 2: (a) A distomolar distal to the lower right third molar, that is, γ8dm. (b) A supernumerary tooth between first and second right premolars, that is, γ4S

Click here to view


Fused teeth [Figure 3] - Two teeth united during development by union of their tooth germs; the teeth may be joined by the enamel of their crowns, by their root dentin, or by both. [17],[18]
Figure 3: Fused teeth in the lower right second molar, that is, γ7f

Click here to view


Gemination: It is the formation of two teeth from the same follicle, and there is one common pulp chamber, which results in the embryological persistence of dental lamina. In gemination, the normal number of teeth is usually present for a given dental age, but one is geminated. [19]

Mesiodens [Figure 4] - A mesiodens is the most common supernumerary (extra) tooth. It is located in the maxilla in the midline (hence the special name, which means "middle tooth"). They can be well-formed or maybe just little clumps of tooth-like stuff. [20],[21]
Figure 4: A mesiodens between upper two central incisors, that is, β1mγ1

Click here to view



   Modified Chart of Codes Top




How the codes are constructed

Quadrant codes

α Upper right permanent arch
β Upper left permanent arch
γ Lower left permanent arch
δ Lower right permanent arch
π Upper right deciduous arch
ε Upper left deciduous arch
λ Lower left deciduous arch
η Lower right deciduous arch

Tooth codes

  1. Central incisors (permanent teeth)/(deciduous teeth)
  2. Lateral incisors (permanent teeth)/(deciduous teeth)
  3. Canines (permanent teeth)/(deciduous teeth)
  4. 1 st Premolars (permanent teeth)/1 st molar (deciduous teeth)
  5. 2 nd Premolars (permanent teeth)/2 nd molar (deciduous teeth)
  6. 1 st Molars (permanent teeth)
  7. 2 nd Molars (permanent teeth)
  8. 3 rd Molars (permanent teeth)




Note: When the supernumerary tooth is in between two adjacent teeth in that arch, the position of the supernumerary tooth shall be coordinated with the tooth, which is medial to the tooth and not the distal tooth. This rule is not applicable to mesiodens or the supernumerary tooth in the midline of the arch wherein both teeth at the midline have to be recorded for notations. To further clarify, in notating a fused tooth, the normal tooth to which there is a fusion will be taken into consideration.




   Advantages Top


  • It fulfills the following basic requirements:
  • Provides a cognitive, visual sense, and computer sense.
  • Easy to record on a computer.
  • Convenience of use in the present days of instant distant communication such as medical transcription.
  • Identification, interaction, and communication regarding the dentition other than the normal dentition in the oral cavity.
  • Simple to teach and understand.
  • Adaptation and modification to the Universal system, FDI, and other two digit systems in use at present for better patient management and dental care.
  • Easily adaptable to standard charts used in general practice.
  • Readily communicable in print and by telephone.
  • Easy to describe in conversation and dictation.

   Discussion and Conclusion Top


This system has been devised to overcome the drawbacks and shortcomings of previous notation systems. This article reports the design of a supernumerary tooth notation system and fulfills the vacuum, but is definitely not an attempt to replace the well-established and popular notation systems.

Sarjeev's supernumerary notation system allows us to designate teeth in both permanent and deciduous dentition that are not normal components of human dentition. The notations for quadrant codes are (α), (β), (γ), and (δ) for permanent dentition, and (π), (ε), (λ), and (η) for deciduous dentition.

Greek mathematical symbols have been used since numbers and alphabets (alphanumeric) codes have been used in the FDI notation and the Universal numbering system. Roman numerals followed by capital alphabets were formerly used in the Palmer notation.

To classify and to have notations that are universally acceptable, useful, time saving, and effective for all tooth hard tissue components, other than the normal, has been the main aim of this original review article. The concept of Sarjeev's supernumerary tooth notations is novel and fulfills the need of the present day scenario of having a dental tooth notation system to notify supernumerary teeth of human dentition.

Concluding with a personal favorite quote, "Today is yesterday's result and tomorrow's cause".

 
   References Top

1.FDI Two Digit Notation. Available from: http://www.fdiworldental.org/two-digit-notation. [Last accessed on 2012 Dec 21].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.American Dental Association. Council on Dental Practice: Dental Abbreviation, Symbols and Acronyms. Designation for teeth, 2nd ed. 2008. p. 35. Available from: http://www.ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/dentalpractice_abbreviations.pdf [Last accessed on 2008 Dec 14].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Ferguson JW. The Palmer notation system and its use with personal computer applications. Br Dent J 2005;198:551-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Bosworth System. Available from: www.dentalassistant.org. [Last Accessed on 2012 April 18].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.ISO 3950:2009 Dentistry - Designation system for teeth and areas of the oral cavity.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Kokten G, Balcioglu H, Buyukertan M. Supernumerary fourth and fifth molars: A report of two cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003;4:67-76.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Brook AH. Dental anomalies on number, form and size: Their prevalence in British school children. J Int Assoc Dent Child 1974;5:37-42.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Scheiner MA, Sampson WJ. Supernumerary teeth: A review of literature and four case reports. Aust Dent J 1997;42:160-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Kinirons MJ. Unerupted premaxillary supernumerary teeth: A study of their occurrence in males and females. Br Dent J 1982;153:110.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Salem G. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in Saudi children from Gizan region. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17:162-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent 1998;43:395-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Alaejos C, Contreras MA, Buenechea R, Berini L, Gay C. Mesiodens: A retrospective study of 44 patients. Med Oral 2000;5:81-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Danalli DN, Buzzato JF, Braum TW, Murphy SM. Long-term interdisciplinary management of multiple mesiodens and delayed eruption: Report of a case. J Dent Child 1988;55:376-80.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Gay C, Mateos M, Spain A, Gargallo J. Other impacted teeth: Mesiodens and other supernumerary teeth. Teeth included. In: Gay C, Berini L, Editors. Oral Surgery. Madrid: Editorial Ergon, Madrid, 1999. p. 511-50.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Dubuk AN, Selvig KA, Tellefsen G, Wikesjö UM. Atypically located paramolar. Report of a rare case. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:138-40.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Kakolewska-Maczyñska J, Zyszko A. Paramolar and distomolar teeth. Czas Stomatol 1990;43:232-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Schulze C. Developmental anomalies of the teeth and the jaws. In: Gorlin RJ, Goldman HM, editors. Thoma's Oral Pathology. 6 th ed. St. Louis; 1970. p. 96-183.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Braham RL. Developmental anomalies of dentition - A scientific review. Pediatr Dent J 1995;5:105-16.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Nirmala S, Velpula L, Nuvvula S, Mallineni SK. An unusual occurrence of geminated primary tooth with talon's cusp. J Dr NTR Univ Health Sci 2012;1:187-91.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Gallas MM, Garcia A. Retention of permanent incisors by mesiodens: A family affair. Br Dent J 2000;188:63-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Seddon RP, Johnstone SC, Smith PB. Mesiodentes in twins: A case report and review of literature. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997;7:177-84.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sarjeev Singh Yadav
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Afzalgunj, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.118009

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Anatomic and Examination Considerations of the Oral Cavity
Mansoor Madani,Thomas Berardi,Eric T. Stoopler
Medical Clinics of North America. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Chart of Codes
    Modified Chart o...
   Advantages
    Discussion and C...
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed8646    
    Printed46    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded303    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal