Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 859

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL RESEARCH  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 684-687
"Rx - The mistakes we make!!": A short study


Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.L.E.S's Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission30-Oct-2009
Date of Decision13-Sep-2010
Date of Acceptance11-Apr-2011
Date of Web Publication7-Mar-2012
 

   Abstract 

Context: There is concern regarding the irrational production, prescription and use of drugs in India.
Aim: This study aimed to describe the quality of prescriptions by dental practitioners of one particular college in a short period of time.
Materials and Methods: A survey of all prescriptions dispensed from the various departments of K.L.E.S.'s Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, was conducted by collecting them from the patients exiting the college premises. The prescriptions were photocopied and handed back to the patients. The samples were collected over a period of 7 days. The samples were then analyzed for their content based on an ideal prescription format and the results were tabulated.
Results: The findings of the study suggest that most of the prescriptions given are woefully inadequate in content.
Conclusions: It can be concluded that a clear policy about the standard of prescriptions and periodic internal monitoring is the answer for quality prescriptions. Computerization of the prescription format is also a thought-provoking alternative.

Keywords: Dental, ideal prescriptions, prescriptions

How to cite this article:
Rathnam A, Madan N. "Rx - The mistakes we make!!": A short study. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:684-7

How to cite this URL:
Rathnam A, Madan N. "Rx - The mistakes we make!!": A short study. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Aug 11];22:684-7. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2011/22/5/684/93457
In the absence of a clear, comprehensive and rational drug policy, the production of pharmaceutical prepa­rations in India is grossly distorted. [1] Thus, Indian markets are flooded with over 70,000 formulations, compared to roughly 350 preparations listed on the WHO Essential Drugs List. There are thousands of drug companies, and several compa­nies manufacture generic preparations using different brand names. In addition, thousands of formulations of vitamins, ton­ics and multi-drug combinations that are unique to the In­dian market are manufactured and marketed here.

The aim of this study was to survey the quality and content of prescriptions provided by the various students and staff of all departments of K.L.E.S's Institute of Dental Sciences as part of an internal monitoring program. Our focus was not on whether the drugs were indicated for the patient's illness, but on the layout and content of the prescription. In particular, we wished to study the quality of the prescriptions in terms of the ad­equacy and clarity of the information contained therein.


   Materials and Methods Top


The present study was conducted in the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.L.E.S.'s Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum.

A cross-sectional survey of all prescriptions received by the patients over a period of 7 consecutive days in July 2007 (01/07/07-07/07/07) was conducted. All the patients who were exiting the institution after obtaining treatment were approached for involvement in the study. Any prescriptions that they had obtained were photocopied and returned to the patients. The patients were approached so as to ensure that the doctors providing the prescriptions did not have knowledge of the study being conducted. This was done to avoid bias. No attempt was made to assess whether the prescriptions were written by students, interns or staff doctors. The prescriptions obtained therein were photocopied and returned to the patients [Figure 1]. The photocopies were retained as the sample proof of the study.
Figure 1: Example of collected prescription

Click here to view


The layout of the prescriptions was assessed on the basis of the presence or absence of the understated details. Eleven parameters were assessed in each prescription. [2] They were as follows.

  • Patient information (five parameters)

    • Name, Age, Sex, Address, Date of treatment
    Doctor's information (four parameters)

    • Department name, Name of Doctor, Signature, Contact Number
    Documentation of the drugs in the case paper
  • Instructions given to the patient (verbal/written)
  • The clarity of prescriptions was assessed on the basis of the following points: [2]
  • Whether the prescription was legible (4-point rating system):

    • Score 1: Prescription details are clear and legible
    • Score 2: Clear but requires effort to read
    • Score 3: One aspect not clear (patient name/drug name)
    • Score 4: More than one aspect not clear
  • The details of drugs prescribed were also rated (4-point rating system)

    • Score 1: Clear and legible, Drug details present
    • Score 2: Clear but requires effort to read
    • Score 3: Criteria not met for one drug
    • Score 4: Criteria not met for more than one drug
An overall rating system based on the above criteria was also given:

Scoring: Parameter present (1), absent (0)

Legibility: 1-4

Drug details: 1-4

Maximum and minimum scoring: 19 and 2, respectively

The prescriptions were rated by the lead author. Hence, there was no possibility of inter-examiner variability or bias. The results were tabulated and the data were analyzed using SPSS software version 11.


   Results Top


A total of 122 samples of prescriptions were procured. An overall rating for all the prescriptions showed 93% of the samples to be in the average category with one or more details missing.

On analysis of the separate details of the prescriptions, the following were the discrepancies noted in brief.

Personal details (percentage of prescriptions showing missing information)

Name: 4

Age: 91

Sex: 100

Address: 100

Doctor's details

Doctor's name: 92

Department: 12

Signature: 16

Phone no.: 97

In a comparison of the legibility of the samples, the following could be noted:

(4-Point scoring scale)

Score 1: 39%

Score 2: 54%

Score 3: 7%

Score 4: 0%

Documentation of the prescription in the patient's case paper was also checked and verified. This was found to be positive in 69% of the case papers.


   Discussion Top


A well-written prescription reflects both on the doctor and the institution concerned. Hence, it is the prerogative of all the doctors and the institutions to make a concentrated effort to standardize the quality of prescriptions emanating from the various hospitals in the country.

The results of this study have thrown up some interesting and depressing results. In most prescriptions, one or more aspects of the patient's personal details were missing [Figure 2]. In most cases, it was also noted that the concerned doctor's details were also lacking [Figure 3]. The legibility of the prescriptions were also suspect in many instances [Figure 4]. This will pose a problem for proper record maintenance and give rise to many medico-legal complications. From the patient's point of view, he will not be in a position to intimate the doctor concerned if a particular brand of medicine is not available. This puts the onus of selecting a suitable alternative on the shoulders of the pharmacist.
Figure 2: Patient's details - what is missing

Click here to view
Figure 3: Doctor's details - what is missing

Click here to view
Figure 4: Legibility of prescriptions

Click here to view


Another aspect of the issue is the documentation of the prescription on the case paper [Figure 5]. A reading of the case paper should give all the pertinent information required by the doctor to make a correct choice regarding the patient's treatment protocol. The error of not noting the prescriptions on the case record will lead to problems of repeated drug intake for the same problem, posing a threat to the health of the patient. The overall rating given for the prescriptions is also provided [Figure 6].
Figure 5: Documentation - present or absent

Click here to view
Figure 6: Overall rating for prescriptions

Click here to view


It is also interesting to note that most of the instructions given to the patient about the procedure of intake of medicines were verbal [Table 1]. [3] This is a very troubling aspect as it is dependent on the patient's understanding, the doctor's communication and the language barriers between both. This facet should be discouraged and clear written instructions should be provided in the prevailing language/languages of the region. It is also a fact that self-medication is rampant in India based on earlier prescriptions or pharmacist's advice. [4]
Table 1: Model prescription sample

Click here to view


The path forward in this issue is computerization. A well-formatted and properly worded prescription format can be created that is to be used by all the doctors. This will also allow them the flexibility of highlighting the instructions already printed on the prescription format. Computerized individual billing and prescription will also allow a ready entry and track check for the medicines that the patient has been consuming in the particular period. It would be heartening if all the dental colleges of the country adopt a unified prescription format which will also allow national standardization. This is an aspect requiring thought by the eminent faculty of Dentistry in India. On my part as a humble contribution, I have provided a modified version of the prescription format I have availed from a similar study done in Goa [2] and Uttaranchal. [5]

The format given below provides for ease of prescribing with the need of either highlighting the right choices or filling in the blanks to complete the prescription. The provision of providing the same information in the regional language of that particular geographic area also allows for the patient to read and understand the dosage instructions provided. This form can be made computerized with a particular number for each prescription. This number should be inserted in the case report for proper documentation. This will go a long way toward the provision of standardized, understandable prescriptions by the doctors of this country.

Short problem-based training courses, continuing education programs and workshops can be conducted to provide updated and current information on pharmacotherapy. They can also be used to hone prescription skills of the people involved.

These initiatives will provide the pathway for standardized, evidence-based dental pharmacotherapy in India.


   Conclusions Top


The present data depict the following:

  • Most of the prescriptions obtained in this study were inadequate and had several important details missing.
  • The overall legibility of the prescriptions also required thought as they were deemed average in rating.
To have better prescriptions and better health care facilities in the various dental colleges in India, a computerized format would be the answer.


   Acknowledgments Top


All my post graduate colleagues, teaching staff and non-teaching staff of Department of Pediatric dentistry are acknowledged. A special mention of Dr. Indushekar KR, Dr. Anand L Shigli and Dr. Dayanand Shirol.

 
   References Top

1.Sarkar PK. A rational drug policy. Indian J Med Ethics 2004;1:11-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Patel V, Vaidhya R, Naik D, Borker P. Irrational Drug use in India: A Prescription survey from Goa. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:9-12.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Srinivasan S. A network for the rational and ethical use of drugs. Indian J Med Ethics 2004;1:13-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Greenhalgh T. Drug prescription and self-medication in India: An exploratory sur­vey. Soc Sci Med 1987;25:307-18.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Rishi RK, Sangeeta S, Surendra K, Tailang M. Prescription audit: Experience in Garhwal (Uttaranchal), India. Trop Doct 2003;33:76-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Arun Rathnam
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.L.E.S's Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.93457

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 medical prescription form as a tool of communication in medical practice in muscat: an evaluation study
abukhader, m.m.
asian journal of pharmaceutical and clinical research. 2014; 7(1): 18-21
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4022    
    Printed61    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded282    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal