Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 371

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
CASE REPORT Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 377-379
Chlorhexidine urticaria: A rare occurrence with a common mouthwash


Department of Periodontics, Subharti Dental College, Meerut (U.P), India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission19-Jul-2008
Date of Decision17-Dec-2008
Date of Acceptance01-Apr-2009
Date of Web Publication30-Oct-2009
 

   Abstract 

Chlorhexidine is a widely used antiseptic and disinfectant in medical and nonmedical environments. Compared to its ubiquitous use, allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine has rarely been reported and so its sensitization rate seems to be low. The prevalence of contact urticaria and anaphylaxis due to chlorhexidine remains to be unknown. This case report presents a case of urticaria due to oral use of chlorhexidine. The adverse reaction was confirmed by skin prick test.

Keywords: Allergic contact dermatitis, chlorhexidine, delayed hypersensitivity, urticaria

How to cite this article:
Sharma A, Chopra H. Chlorhexidine urticaria: A rare occurrence with a common mouthwash. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:377-9

How to cite this URL:
Sharma A, Chopra H. Chlorhexidine urticaria: A rare occurrence with a common mouthwash. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2009 [cited 2017 Apr 25];20:377-9. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2009/20/3/377/57368
Chlorhexidine gluconate is a cationic bis-biguanide, with a very broad antimicrobial spectrum. Chlorhexidine's antimicrobial effects are associated with the attractions between chlorhexidine (cation) and negatively charged bacterial cells. After chlorhexidine is absorbed onto the organism's cell wall, it disrupts the integrity of the cell membrane and causes the leakage of intracellular components of the organisms. The first report of its antiplaque activity was by Loe and Schiott. [1]

The major advantage of chlorhexidine over most of the other compounds lies in its substantivity. It binds to hard and soft tissues in the mouth enabling it to act over a long period after use. Bacterial counts in saliva consistently drop to between 10 and 20% of baseline after single rinses and remain at this level for at least 7 h [2] and probably more than 12 h. [3]

This paper presents a case report of immediate hypersensitivity reaction to chlorhexidine due to oral rinsing (topical application) of chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash (Rexidin mouthwash).


   Case Report Top


A 19-year-old female patient with the chief complaint of bleeding from the gums reported to the Department of Periodontics at Subharti Dental College, Meerut. After thorough oral examination, she was advised oral prophylaxis and was prescribed chlorhexidine mouth rinse (Rexidin), twice daily for a period of three weeks. Next day, patient presented with urticaria on her forehead and face, the front of the elbow and forearms, side and upper back region of the neck and on the lower abdomen. No oral changes were observed.

On questioning, the patient reported using chlorhexidine mouthwash (Rexidin) formulation in a 1:1 concentration and rinsed with it for at least 1 min. On rinsing with it for the first time she noticed reddening on her forehead, face and side of the neck (after about 12 h of using it) [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. On waking up the next morning, she felt some burning sensation on the red spots, which she had noticed the previous night. Upon using the formulation again, after a couple of hours she observed marked redness on her upper back [Figure 3] neck region, lower abdomen, and on the front of the elbow and forearms [Figure 4]. This was accompanied with irritation. History of any previous such allergic reactions were also recorded.

To confirm the allergic reaction to chlorhexidine, skin prick test was performed in the following was:

  • The inner forearm of the patient was cleaned with soap and water and was coded with a skin marker pen. A drop of allergen (chlorhexidine) was then placed besides the mark.
  • A small prick through the drop was made to the skin using a sterile prick lancet.
  • The excess allergen solution was dabbed off with a tissue.


A reaction was seen within 30 min of performing the test. The skin under the drop of the chlorhexidine solution had become red and itchy and this was surrounded by a white raised wheal.


   Discussion Top


The result of the skin prick test confirmed that the urticaria with which the patient reported was caused by the topical use of the chlorhexidine mouthwash in a 1:1 concentration. Though rare chlorhexidine can cause immediate hypersensitivity, sometimes taking the form of acute urticaria that may result in anaphylactic shock which is even rarer. [4],[5]

Urticaria was suspected to be caused by the mouthwash, and a skin test was conducted. Intradermal test was positive with the mouthwash and its component chlorhexidine gluconate. Scratch test showed positive result with chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine hydrochloride.

The various tests which can be used to confirm the allergic reactions to chlorhexidine are as follows:

  1. Prick tests.
  2. Intradermal reactions.
  3. Sulfidoleukotriene stimulation test (CAST: Cellular antigen stimulation test).
  4. Patch test.


Similar reactions [6],[7] have also been reported after the use of chlorhexidine as a spray or as pre and postoperative antiseptic solutions. Goon et al. [8] reported five cases of allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine, out of which three had positive patch test reactions to chlorhexidine.

A literature review of 66 case reports was done by Heinemann et al. [9] Twenty reactions occurred when chlorhexidine was applied to damaged skin surfaces and 27 patients showed an immediate type reaction when chlorhexidine was applied to mucous membranes. Similarly, two cases of mucosal sensitivity to contact with chlorhexidine were reported by Yusof and Khoo. [10]

Kenrad [11] also reported major changes in the oral mucosa after an overdose of mouth rinsing with chlorhexidine gluconate, which included a thickening of the mucosa resembling leukoplakia but disappeared when the dose was reduced.

In a case report similar to the present one, anaphylaxis due to topical skin application of chlorhexidine was reported. This was confirmed by skin testing and CAST. Thus, the application of chlorhexidine especially to mucous membranes was discouraged as it could cause anaphylaxis. [12]

Hypersensitivity and other adverse reactions to chlorhexidine are rare, but its potential to cause anaphylactic shock is probably underestimated.


   Conclusion Top


Chlorhexidine is the most effective and widely used antiplaque agent to date. Nevertheless, the present case report would remind the clinicians of an important potential risk of this widely used antiseptic and make them cautious before prescribing any chlorhexidine formulation as it may lead to local symptoms or even severe attacks.

 
   References Top

1.Loe H, Schiott CR. The effect of mouthrinses and topical application of chlorhexidine on the development of dental plaque and gingivitis in man. J Periodontol Res 1970;5:79-83.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Addy M, Wright R. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinses. J Clin Periodontol 1978;5:198-205.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Schiott CR, Loe H, Jensen SB, Killian M, Davies RM, Glavind K. The effect of chlorhexidine mouthrinses on the human oral flora. J Periodont Res 1970;5:84-9.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Flotra L, Gijermo P, Rolla G, Waerhaug J. Side effects of chlorhexidine mouthwashes. Scand J Dent Res 1971;79:119-25.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Beaudouin E, Kanny G, Morisset M, Renaudin JM, Mertes M, Laxenaire MC, et al. Immediate Hypersensitivity to Chlorhexidine: Literature review. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;36:123-6.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]    
6.Okano M, Nomura M, Hata S, Okada N, Sato K, Kitano Y, et al. Anaphylactic symptoms due to Chlorhexidine gluconate. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:50-2.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Yoneyama K, Hatamochi A, Murata K, Shinkai H. A case of urticaria due to the gurgle containing chlorhexidine gluconate. Japanese Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2002;56:106-8.   Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Goon AT, White IR, Rycroft RJ, McFadden JP. Allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine. Dermatitis 2004;15:45-7.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Heinemann C, Sinaiko R, Maibach HI. Immunological contact urticaria and anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine: Overview. Exogenous Dermatology 2002;1:186-94.   Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Yusof WZ, Khoo SP. Mucosal sensitivity to chlorhexidine mouthwashes. Singapore Dent J 1988;13:39-40.   Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]    
11.Kenrad B. Toxic effects from chlorhexidine gluconate. Case report. Tandlaegebladet 1990;94:489-91.   Back to cited text no. 11      
12.Krautheim AB, Jermann TH, Bircher AJ. Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: Case report and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:113-6.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Harneet Chopra
Department of Periodontics, Subharti Dental College, Meerut (U.P)
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.57368

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Chlorhexidine
Dianne L. Silvestri,Melissa McEnery-Stonelake
Dermatitis. 2013; 24(3): 112
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Chlorhexidine and hypersensitivity reactions in dentistry
M. N. Pemberton,J. Gibson
BDJ. 2012; 213(11): 547
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Chlorhexidine and hypersensitivity reactions in dentistry
Pemberton, M.N. and Gibson, J.
British Dental Journal. 2012; 213(11): 547-550
[Pubmed]
4 Chlorhexidine allergy due to topical application
Keni, N.N. and Aras, M.A. and Chitre, V.
Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2012; 23(5): 674-676
[Pubmed]
5 Mastocytosis: Oral implications of a rare disease
Rama, T.A. and Côrte-Real, I. and Gomes, P.S. and Escribano, L. and Fernandes, M.H.
Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2011; 40(6): 441-450
[Pubmed]
6 Skin cleansers: The risks of chlorhexidine
Sivathasan, N., Goodfellow, P.B.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2011; 51(5): 785-786
[Pubmed]
7 Quantitative analysis of skeletal symmetric chlorhexidine in rat plasma using doubly charged molecular ions in LC-MS/MS detection
Pan, J., Fair, S.J., Mao, D.
Bioanalysis. 2011; 3(12): 1357-1368
[Pubmed]
8 Skin Cleansers: The Risks of Chlorhexidine
Niroshan Sivathasan,Peter Bryan Goodfellow
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2011; 51(5): 785
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Quantitative analysis of skeletal symmetric chlorhexidine in rat plasma using doubly charged molecular ions in LCMS/MS detection
Jiongwei Pan,Sarah J Fair,Dunmin Mao
Bioanalysis. 2011; 3(12): 1357
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Mastocytosis: oral implications of a rare disease : Oral implications of mastocytosis
T. A. Rama, I. Crte-Real, P. S. Gomes, L. Escribano, M. H. Fernandes
Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2010; : no
[VIEW] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
    Case Report
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4709    
    Printed233    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded400    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 10    

Recommend this journal