Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental ResearchIndian Journal of Dental Research
HOME | ABOUT US | EDITORIAL BOARD | AHEAD OF PRINT | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | INSTRUCTIONS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT
Indian Journal of Dental Research   Login   |  Users online: 41

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size         

 


 
REVIEW ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 222-226
Tissue engineering and its implications in dentistry


Department of Pedodontia, People's Dental Academy, Karond Bhanpur Bypass Road, Bhopal - 462010, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission07-Jul-2007
Date of Decision05-Oct-2007
Date of Acceptance25-Nov-2008
Date of Web Publication23-Jun-2009
 

   Abstract 

Tissue engineering is a novel and highly exciting field of research. With tissue engineering techniques it may be possible to repair damaged tissues or even create replacement organs. This article reviews the principles underlying key tissue engineering strategies and the typical components used. Examples of tissue engineering include passive approaches, such as dental implants, and inductive approaches, in which specific molecular signals are used to activate cells.

Keywords: Tissue engineering, tissue induction, cell transplantation, gene therapy

How to cite this article:
Tyagi P, Dhindsa MK. Tissue engineering and its implications in dentistry. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:222-6

How to cite this URL:
Tyagi P, Dhindsa MK. Tissue engineering and its implications in dentistry. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2009 [cited 2014 Jul 23];20:222-6. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2009/20/2/222/52895
Tissue engineering builds on the interface between material science and biocompatibility and integrates cells, natural or synthetic scaffolds, and specific signals to create new tissues.

Historically, some of the earliest attempts at tissue replacement, dating back to thousands of years, have involved teeth. [1] In modern times, dentistry continues to place considerable emphasis on, and be a leader in, the study and use of biocompatible materials. The purpose of this brief review is to provide the practicing dentist with a general perspective and background on tissue engineering, an overview of what has been accomplished in this field thus far, and a consideration of the likely impact of tissue engineering on the practice of dentistry over the next 25 years.


   Tissue Engineering Takes Many Forms Top


Currently, the replacement of lost or deficient tissues involves the use of prosthetic materials, drug therapies, and tissue and organ transplantation. However, all of these have limitations; for example, the inability of synthetic prostheses to replace any but the simplest structural functions of a tissue. Such problems have driven the development of tissue engineering, which can be defined as a 'combination of the principles and methods of the life sciences with those of engineering to develop materials and methods to repair damaged or diseased tissues and to create entire tissue replacements. [2]

The basic hypothesis underlying this approach is that the local delivery of an appropriate factor, at the correct dose and for a defined period of time, will lead to the recruitment, proliferation, and differentiation of cells from adjacent sites, which will then participate in tissue repair and/or regeneration at the diseased site.

A second strategy in tissue engineering makes use of cells grown in the laboratory and placed in a matrix at the site where new tissue or organ formation is desired. These transplanted cells are usually derived from a small tissue biopsy specimen and have been expanded in the laboratory to allow a large organ or tissue mass to be engineered. Typically, the new tissue will be formed in part from these transplanted cells.

Most tissue engineering efforts use biomaterials already approved by the FDA. The most widely used synthetic materials are polymers of lactide and glycolide. [3] A natural polymer-type I collagen-is often used because of its relatively good biocompatibility and ability to be remodeled by cells. Other polymers familiar to dentistry, including alginate, are also in use.


   Preclinical and Clinical Accomplishments Top


Conductive approaches

A dental implant is an example of a conductive (or passive) approach to tissue engineering. Today, implants are considered a standard treatment option, in conjunction with prosthetic rehabilitation, for replacing multiple and single teeth. Another, widely used and relatively simple example of a conductive approach to tissue engineering is guided tissue regeneration. It is used to regenerate the periodontal supporting structures and uses a material barrier to create a protected compartment for selective wound healing. [4],[5]

Tissue induction

The inductive approach uses activation of cells situated close to the damaged or deficient tissue with specific signals. New bone could be formed at a nonmineralizing site after implantation of powdered bone. This discovery led to the isolation of the active ingredients from the bone powder, the cloning of the genes encoding these proteins, and their now large scale production by a number of companies. [6],[7] These proteins, termed bone morphogenetic proteins or BMPS, have been used in many clinical trials, including in studies on nonhealing long bone fractures and periodontal tissue regeneration, and are presently in the early phase of FDA review.

The identification of proteins that promote new blood vessel formation, and their clinical application, followed closely the identification and use of the BMPS. Judah Folkman was the first to recognize that specific molecules regulate new blood vessel formation. Several such molecules are now known that either promote or inhibit this process. [8] These have found several applications, including in the induction of new vessel formation to bypass blocked arteries.

An alternative tissue-inductive approach involves placing specific extracellular matrix molecules on a scaffold support at the tissue site. These molecules will have the ability to direct the function of cells already present at that site and, therefore, to promote the formation of a desired tissue or structure. For example, a preparation of enamel proteins derived from pigs is used to promote new bone formation in periodontal defects. [9] The Forsyth researchers induced the growth of small, recognizable tooth crowns within a period of 30 weeks from cells obtained from immature teeth of 6-month-old pigs seeded onto biodegradable polymer scaffolds and placed in a rat host. [10]

For tissue induction to be successful clinically, it is critical to deliver the appropriate biologically active factors to the desired site at the appropriate dose and for the necessary time. Typically, many of these proteins have short half-lives in the body, yet they need to be present for an extended period to be effective. Up until now, clinicians and researchers have addressed these concerns by delivering extremely large doses of the protein at the sites of interest. More recently, the efforts have been to develop controlled-release systems. [11] A somewhat similar approach involves the delivery of a gene that encodes for the inductive factor, instead of delivering the protein itself.

An unresolved issue in tissue engineering is whether multiple protein signals, perhaps presented in a specific sequence, may be necessary to develop fully functional tissues.

Cell transplantation

Cell transplantation is an extremely attractive option when the inductive for a specific tissue factors are not known, when a large tissue mass or organ is needed, or when tissue replacement must be immediate.

The greatest success in this area has been the development of a tissue-engineered skin equivalent. For example, 250,000 ft 2 of skin tissue can be manufactured from a 1 in 2 sample of starting tissue. [12] A similar approach has also been developed for replacement of oral mucosa. [13],[14]

The designing of polymer scaffolds with the appropriate mechanical and degradative properties has allowed investigators to engineer new cartilaginous tissues in animal models with precisely defined sizes and shapes (e.g., nasal septum and ear), which makes this method potentially useful for craniofacial reconstruction. [15],[16]

Two approaches are currently being studied for the development of vasculature to support the metabolic needs of the organs and for the integration of the engineered organ with the host. The first involves transplantation of endothelial cells on the scaffold with the tissue cells typed of interest. Transplanted endothelial cells can increase the vasculature in polymer scaffolds and integrate with growing host capillaries. [17] The second approach uses localized delivery of inductive angiogenic factors at the site of the engineered tissue. [11] Experiments on mice show that tooth rudiments can be formed in in vitro cultures of nondental stem cells, and complete teeth and associated bone can be obtained when these rudiments are transferred to adult mice. [18]

Gene therapy

Generally, gene therapy is not considered to be an example of tissue engineering. However, gene transfers to well-differentiated cells arguably can be viewed as one way of engineering a tissue. In the clinical setting, gene transfer has been used in the treatment of two children suffering from a severe combined immunodeficiency resulting from an inherited reduced production of the enzyme adenosine deaminase (ADA). [19] These patients were treated with a procedure termed ex vivo gene therapy. In this method, the ADA gene was transferred to their lymphocytes in the laboratory and these modified cells were then reinfused into the patients. Both patients are alive today. However, it is not possible to conclude that their survival was the result of gene transfer because conventional therapy was also administered along with the genetically modified cells.

Hundreds of clinical research protocols have been approved worldwide for gene transfer in a wide range of conditions, including cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, and numerous malignancies. The principal problem is the lack of adequate gene transfer vectors to deliver foreign genes to host cells. Most often modified viruses are used, but all common viruses have their drawbacks. [20],[21] There is considerable research activity taking place in this field. New vectors, both nonviral and viral, are being developed and are likely to offer many advantages over current gene delivery systems. It is reasonable to expect that clinical gene transfer therapy will be routine, as both primary and adjunctive therapy, within the next 10-20 years.

Safety measures in gene therapy

There is unanimity among experts that gene therapy trials should only be carried out under certain safety rules. The nature and scope of these rules and their legislative basis are, however, matters of controversy. As far as the legal framework is concerned, one side argues that safety is adequately ensured through the network of existing regulations. The other side criticizes the current situation as a tangle of legal regulations and expresses grave doubts that this takes adequate account of the specific hazards of gene therapy techniques.

An overview of the international regulatory mechanisms shows clearly that, despite widely varying legislative approaches, the emphasis in (legislative) efforts everywhere is on patient safety and biological safety. [22] For example:



  • There are strict test criteria for pharmaceuticals (which also apply to gene therapy), and this is one way of limiting the risks associated with gene therapy. Thus, licensing of gene therapy projects is subject to demanding requirements.


  • There are ethics commissions present in all the countries; these commissions serve to ensure the maximum possible safety for the patient. In all the important countries (except Italy), the opinion (at least 'consultative') of the ethics commissions has to be obtained before approval is granted for conduct of gene therapy trials in humans.


  • Another important safeguard is the professional ethical regulations covering the clinical applications of gene therapy. In the overwhelming majority of regulatory systems these are concerned (inter alia) with:

    Adequate clinical pre-trials

    Risk-benefit reviews in the use of gene therapy techniques on humans

    Prior patient education and consent

    Consultation with an ethical commission


  • In addition to the specific statutory regulations there are also the general statutes on civil and criminal liability, which apply on a subsidiary basis.


Biological safety is ensured through various forms of legislation. All countries have a national (official) licensing authority. These are also the basis for establishing a common European licensing authority responsible for biological safety in member states.

Besides the common features indicated above, there are also differences in the ethics commissions of various countries, for example, in terms of the statutory basis of the ethics commissions, the commission's responsibilities, and the binding nature of their votes.

  • Under French law, there is a separate act (the 'Loi Huriet') covering the duties and responsibilities of the ethics commissions. In German law, the ethics commission's powers are covered by section 40 I of the Drugs Act and, in Austria, by sections 30 et seq. of the Genetic Engineering Act. In Italy, on the other hand, there is no special regulation covering the responsibilities of the ethics commissions.
  • In the USA, the responsibilities of the local ethics commissions are limited to projects promoted by the National Institutes of Health. The licensing procedure in the UK operates at two levels: Besides local ethics commissions, the central ethics commissions must also give its approval for every gene therapy project.


With respect to the binding nature of their votes, some national ethics commissions have a purely advisory status, as for example in France. In other countries (e.g., USA, Austria, UK, and Denmark) the commission's vote is more important and can result in refusal of approval.

A look into the future of dentistry

Engineered tissues will find many applications in dentistry within the next few years. However, reconstruction of complex tissue defects, which would require multiple cell types, has not yet been attempted in the craniofacial complex, even in preclinical trials. Such a goal will likely take about 10-15 years to realize.

Mineralized tissue defects

Considerable research activity is focused on applying the principles of tissue engineering to dental and craniofacial structures, probably because of the ease of access to these sites and the extent and nature of the clinical problems. As a departure from the reliance of current clinical practice on durable materials such as amalgam, composite, and metallic alloys, biological therapies utilize mesenchymal stem cells, delivered or internally recruited, to generate craniofacial structures in temporary scaffolding biomaterials. Craniofacial tissue engineering is likely to be realized in the foreseeable future and represents an opportunity that dentistry cannot afford to miss. [23]

BMPS and other growth factor-rich preparations are being applied with a variety of natural and synthetic scaffolds. There may be an advantage to be gained from using polymers that are allowed to flow into a defined site, rather than those that are fixed or implanted. [24],[25]

Gene therapy

There are several examples of the use of gene therapy in the craniofacial area, e.g., in head and neck cancers. [26],[27],[28] In the next decade, clinicians will likely be able to use gene transfer technologies as part of the standard treatment of neoplasms.

Engineering salivary gland function

There are many circumstances involving tissue loss that are non-life threatening yet that markedly affect quality of life, e.g., the loss of salivary gland parenchyma and the consequent inability to make saliva; without saliva, these patients experience dysphasia, rampant caries, mucosal infections, etc. For such patients, a program has been developed to create a 'blind end' tube that would be suitable for engrafting in the buccal mucosa. [29] The lumen of these tubes would be lined with compatible epithelial cells and be physiologically capable of unidirectional water movement. This system should be ready for clinical testing within 10 years.

The major salivary glands are inviting targets for gene transfer, mainly because of the ease of access to the parenchymal cells. Gene transfer has been used to treat patients undergoing ionizing radiation and those with Sjogren syndrome who had some remaining nonsecretory, ductal epithelial cells. The initial aim was rather simplistic: To make the surviving ductal cells secretory in nature and, thus, capable of fluid movement. The major impediment to fluid flow from nonsecreting ductal cells was the absence of a pathway for water in their luminal membranes. So, the strategy was to transfer the gene coding for-the water channel aquaporin-1-into the radiation-surviving cells via a recombinant adenovirus. The virus, AdhAQP1, was tested in an irradiated rat model. Three days after being given AdhAQP1, these rats experienced an increase in fluid production to near normal levels. [30]


   Ethical Concerns Top


There is a significant amount of debate among researchers in the biochemical community about at least two major ethical concerns related to tissue-engineered products. The first, tissue procurement, is also a manufacturing concern. For many tissue-engineered products (such as skin equivalents and bioartifical organs), visible cells are an essential component. If the patient's own cells cannot be amplified in an adequate and timely manner, enabling them to be used in the tissue-engineered device (i.e., a cell autograft), then cells must be derived from another tissue. This situation raises a number of significant ethical issues; for example, should the tissue source be another person or can animal tissue (i.e., a xenograft) be used? If the source is to be another person (i.e., a cell allograft), should the donor be paid for the tissue sample (such as skin or liver)? Such a policy may induce people in financial distress to 'donate' their tissues. Since fetal tissues often have more growth potential than adult tissues, should fetal tissues be used as a cell source? If, as with organs for transplantation, there are not enough cellular sources to meet the demand for any particular tissue-engineered device, how does one decide who will get the products-on the basis of need or ability to pay?

For several cell-based tissue engineering products, the use of animal cells has been explored. Perhaps the most significant effort has been in the development of an artificial pancreas through the use of porcine cells. Recently, researchers have called for a moratorium on research using cellular xengrafts, in large part, because of a hypothetical risk [31],[32],[33] that an animal (in this case, porcine) virus might cross the species barrier and perhaps mutate and result in serious human disease. Although this possibility, with respect to a porcine virus, is hypothetical and there is no evidence that such an event could occur, there is recognition in the research community that the AIDS virus apparently had its origin in primates and 'jumped species' though the human consumption of infected animals. The proposed moratorium on xenograft research recognizes such potential societal implications and would allow public and legislative discussion of xenograft use. Not surprisingly, there is no agreement on this issue, although the dialogue has generally focused attention on the ethical consideration in tissue engineering. [34]


   Conclusion Top


Dental practice has always been affected by new technologies, be it the development of high-speed handpieces, the modern restorative materials, or tissue engineering.

Tissue engineering brings the power of modern biological, chemical, and physical science to solve real clinical problems. This should yield numerous clinical benefits in dentistry, e.g., improved treatment for intraosseus periodontal defects; enhanced maxillary and mandibular grafting procedures, possibly even allowing lost teeth to be regrown; use of devices such as an artificial salivary gland and muscle (tongue) or mucosal grafts to replace tissues lost through surgery or trauma.

 
   References Top

1.Crag RG, Ward ML, editors. Restorative dental materials. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Nerem R, Sambanis A. Tissue engineering: From biology to biological substitutes. Tissue Engg 1995;1:3-13.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Kim BS, Nikolovski J, Bonadio J, Smiley J, Mooney DJ. Engineered smooth muscle tissues: Regulating cell phenotype with the scaffold. Exp Cell Res 1999;251:318-28.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Caudill RF. Guided bone regeneration and implants: History and case reports. In: Block MS, Kent JN, Guerra LR, editors. Implants in dentistry. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1997. p. 183-91.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Becker W. Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal defects. In: Polson AM, editor. Periodontal regeneration: Current status and directions. Chicago: Quinte4ssence Publishing; 1994. p. 137-50.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Uris Mr. Bone: Formation by auto induction. Science 1965;150:893-9.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Cochran DL, Wozney JM. Biological mediators for periodontal regeneration. Periodontal 2000 1999;19:40-58.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Polverini PJ. The pathophsiology of angiogenesis. Crit Rev Biol Med 1995;6:230-47.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Heiji L, Heden G, Svardstrom G, Ostgren A. Enamel matrix derivative (emdogain) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:705-14.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Available from: http//www.forsyth.org. [cited in 2002 Oct]. Journal of Dental Research.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Sheridan ME, Shea LD, Peters MC, Mooney DJ. Bioabsorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering capable of sustained growth factor delivery. J Control Release 2000;64:91-102.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Morrison G. Advances in the skin trade. Mech Engg 1999;121:40-3.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Garlic JA, Fenjves ES. Keratinocyte gene transfer and gene therapy. Crit Rev Oral Bio Med 1996;7:204-21.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Mizuno H, Emi N, Abe A, Takahashi I, Kojima T, Saito H, et al . Successful culture and sustatinability in vivo of genemodified human oral mucosal epithelium. Hum Gene Ther 1999;10:825-30.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
15.Puelacher WC, Money D, Palge KT, Upton J, Vacanti JP, Vacanti CA. Design of nasoseptal cartilage replacements synthesized form biodegradable polymers and chondrocytes. Biomaterials 1994;15:774-8.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Cao Y, Vacanti JP, Paige KT, Upton J, Vacanti CA. Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to product to produce tissue-engineered cartiage in the shape of a human ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:297-304.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
17.Nor JE, Christensen J, Mooney DJ, Poleverini PJ. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis is associated with enhanced endothelial cell survival and induction of Bcl-2 expression. Am J Pathol 1999;154:375-84.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Biosed - Oral Bone : Feb. 2004.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Blaese RM, Culver KW, Miller AD, Carter CS, Fleisher T, Clerici M, et al . T lymphocytes -directed gene therapy for ADA -SCID: Initial trial results after 4 years. Science 1995;270:475-80.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
20.Anderson WF. Human gene therapy. Nature 1998;392:25-30.  Back to cited text no. 20  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
21.Nabel GJ. Development of optimized vectors for gene theraphy. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA 1999;96:326-6.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Testimony on 'gene therapy: Is there oversight for patient safety?'by Amypatterson,M.D. Dircctor,Office of biotechnology activities.National institute of health. U.S. department of health and human services.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Mao JJ, Giannobile WV, Helms JA, Hollister SJ, Krebsbach PH, Longaker MT, et al . Craniofacial tissue engineering by stems Cells. J Dent Res 2006;85:966-79.  Back to cited text no. 23  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
24.Peter SJ, Miller ST, Zhu G, Yasko AW, Mikos AG. In vivo degradation of a poly(propylenefumarate) / b-tracalcium phosphate injectable composite scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 24  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
25.Bouhadir KH, Haussman D, Mooney DJ. Synthesis and mechanical properties of crosslinked poly (aldehyde gulurante) hydrogels. Polymer 1999;40:3575-84.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Gleich LL, Gluckman JL, Armstrong S, Biddinger PW, Miller MA, Balakrishnan K, et al . Alloantigen gene theraphy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of a phase -1trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:1097-104.  Back to cited text no. 26  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
27.Wollenberg B, Kastenbauer, Mundl H, Schaumberg J, Mayer A, Andratschke M, et al . Gene theraphy--phase I trial for primary untreated head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) UICC stage II- IV with a single interumoral injection of hIL - 2 plasmids formulated in DOTMA/ Chol. Hum Gene Ther 1999;10:141-7.  Back to cited text no. 27  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
28.Myers JN. The use of biological therapy in cancer of the headand neck. Curr Prob Cancer 1999;23:106-34.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Baum BJ, Wang S, Cukierman E, Delporte C, Kagami H, Marmary Y, et al . Re-engineering the functions of a terminally differentiated epitheial cell in vivo . Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;875:294-300.  Back to cited text no. 29  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
30.Delporte C, O'Connell BC, He X, Lancaster HE, O'Connell AC, Agre P, et al . Increased fluid secretion following adenoviral medicated transfer of the aquaporin -1 C DNA to irradiated rat salivary glands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:3268-73.  Back to cited text no. 30  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
31.Bach FH, Fineberg HV. Call for a moratorium on xenotransplants. Nature 1998;391:326.  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Hunkeler D. Bioatificial organs risks and requirements. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;875:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 32  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
33.Weiss RA. Xenografts and retroviruses. Science 1999;285;12s21-2.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Stolberg SG. Could this pig save your life? N Y Times Magz 1999; 3:46-51.  Back to cited text no. 34    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Parimala Tyagi
Department of Pedodontia, People's Dental Academy, Karond Bhanpur Bypass Road, Bhopal - 462010
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.52895

PMID: 19553726

Get Permissions




This article has been cited by
1 Gingival mucosa regeneration in athymic mice using in vitro engineered human oral mucosa
Mahmoud Rouabhia,Patricia Allaire
Biomaterials. 2010; 31(22): 5798
[Pubmed]
2 Gingival mucosa regeneration in athymic mice using in vitro engineered human oral mucosa
Rouabhia, M., Allaire, P.
Biomaterials. 2010; 31(22): 5798-5804
[Pubmed]
3 Isolation, cultivation and reproductive activity of human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells
Yan, M., Yang, Y.-Y., Qin, S.-J., Zheng, D.-Y.
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research. 2010; 14(10): 1739-1742
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
    Tissue Engineeri...
    Preclinical and ...
    Ethical Concerns
    Conclusion
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5369    
    Printed171    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded1102    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal